refresh expected results#160537
Closed
laithsakka wants to merge 1 commit intogh/laithsakka/261/basefrom
Closed
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/160537
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 4b9b856 with merge base 87e6c40 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
eellison
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
chuanhaozhuge
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2025
regression introduced by #160314 not much worried about it since it did not effect other inductor benchmarks could not repo locally Pull Request resolved: #160537 Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
|
Can't merge closed PR #160537 |
chuanhaozhuge
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2025
regression introduced by #160314 not much worried about it since it did not effect other inductor benchmarks could not repo locally Pull Request resolved: #160537 Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
can-gaa-hou
pushed a commit
to can-gaa-hou/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
regression introduced by pytorch#160314 not much worried about it since it did not effect other inductor benchmarks could not repo locally Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160537 Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
markc-614
pushed a commit
to markc-614/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2025
regression introduced by pytorch#160314 not much worried about it since it did not effect other inductor benchmarks could not repo locally Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160537 Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
regression introduced by Fix get_free_symbol_uses for several nodes #160314
not much worried about it since it did not effect other inductor benchmarks could not repo locally
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @kadeng @chauhang @amjames @Lucaskabela