guard_or_false cat ops#160250
Closed
laithsakka wants to merge 9 commits intogh/laithsakka/254/basefrom
Closed
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/160250
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ 5 Pending, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit a0a036a with merge base 8ca8b60 ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Collaborator
|
Starting merge as part of PR stack under #160253 |
ColinPeppler
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
jingsh
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Collaborator
|
Adding |
Collaborator
Merge failedReason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: windows-arm64-build-test / test Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
Collaborator
|
Starting merge as part of PR stack under #160251 |
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #160251 Approved by: https://github.com/jingsh, https://github.com/ColinPeppler ghstack dependencies: #160250
can-gaa-hou
pushed a commit
to can-gaa-hou/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
keep existing unbacked semantics unchanged, just use guard_or_false instead of guard_size_obl Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160250 Approved by: https://github.com/ColinPeppler, https://github.com/jingsh
can-gaa-hou
pushed a commit
to can-gaa-hou/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160251 Approved by: https://github.com/jingsh, https://github.com/ColinPeppler ghstack dependencies: pytorch#160250
markc-614
pushed a commit
to markc-614/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2025
keep existing unbacked semantics unchanged, just use guard_or_false instead of guard_size_obl Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160250 Approved by: https://github.com/ColinPeppler, https://github.com/jingsh
markc-614
pushed a commit
to markc-614/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2025
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#160251 Approved by: https://github.com/jingsh, https://github.com/ColinPeppler ghstack dependencies: pytorch#160250
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
keep existing unbacked semantics unchanged, just use guard_or_false instead of guard_size_obl
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov @coconutruben