[dynamo] better way to skip tracing sys.monitoring callables#159369
Closed
williamwen42 wants to merge 1 commit intogh/williamwen42/268/basefrom
Closed
[dynamo] better way to skip tracing sys.monitoring callables#159369williamwen42 wants to merge 1 commit intogh/williamwen42/268/basefrom
williamwen42 wants to merge 1 commit intogh/williamwen42/268/basefrom
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159369
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit db4fecf with merge base 399c89e ( UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Skylion007
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2025
Member
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2025
Add a comment so we know why we're doing this code (followup to #159369) Pull Request resolved: #159493 Approved by: https://github.com/azahed98, https://github.com/Lucaskabela, https://github.com/zou3519, https://github.com/jingsh ghstack dependencies: #159369
yangw-dev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
Better approach to #158171, according to python/cpython#137178 (comment). Pull Request resolved: #159369 Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
yangw-dev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
Add a comment so we know why we're doing this code (followup to #159369) Pull Request resolved: #159493 Approved by: https://github.com/azahed98, https://github.com/Lucaskabela, https://github.com/zou3519, https://github.com/jingsh ghstack dependencies: #159369
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Better approach to #158171, according to python/cpython#137178 (comment).
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @kadeng @chauhang @amjames @Lucaskabela