Conversation
Instead of `(void)foo; // Suppress unused variable`
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/135914
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit ff48c69 with merge base aaabfc8 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
|
@pytorchbot merge -i |
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 2 checks: pull / linux-focal-py3_9-clang9-xla / test (xla, 1, 1, linux.12xlarge), trunk / linux-focal-cuda12.4-py3.10-gcc9-sm86 / test (default, 5, 5, linux.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu) Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Instead of `(void)foo; // Suppress unused variable` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#135914 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/eqy
Instead of
(void)foo; // Suppress unused variablecc @jgong5 @mingfeima @XiaobingSuper @sanchitintel @ashokei @jingxu10