Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/135387
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)As of commit 90264ca with merge base 3e1a4ea ( FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
@int3 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
I've removed them from upstream Triton in triton-lang/triton#4485. It looks like most places in the code use the default value of `fast_flush=True` anyway, though there are two PRs from pearu that use `False`. To my knowledge, there's no reason to use the `False` value. cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang Differential Revision: [D62325778](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D62325778) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge failedReason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR! Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
I've removed them from upstream Triton in triton-lang/triton#4485. It looks like most places in the code use the default value of `fast_flush=True` anyway, though there are two PRs from pearu that use `False`. To my knowledge, there's no reason to use the `False` value. cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames desertfire chauhang Differential Revision: [D62325778](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D62325778) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally' (Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally) |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
I've removed them from upstream Triton in triton-lang/triton#4485. It looks like most places in the code use the default value of `fast_flush=True` anyway, though there are two PRs from @pearu that use `False`. To my knowledge, there's no reason to use the `False` value. Differential Revision: [D62325778](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D62325778) Pull Request resolved: pytorch#135387 Approved by: https://github.com/nmacchioni, https://github.com/jansel
Closes #2324 Note: PyTorch remove it as well: pytorch/pytorch#135387 CI: * ~https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/11015650093~ * https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/11078059091 Signed-off-by: Anatoly Myachev <anatoly.myachev@intel.com>
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
I've removed them from upstream Triton in triton-lang/triton#4485. It looks like most places in the code use the default value of
fast_flush=Trueanyway, though there are two PRs from @pearu that useFalse. To my knowledge, there's no reason to use theFalsevalue.cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang
Differential Revision: D62325778