[DCP] Always create requests for non-tensor objects#125334
Closed
fegin wants to merge 3 commits intogh/fegin/231/basefrom
Closed
[DCP] Always create requests for non-tensor objects#125334fegin wants to merge 3 commits intogh/fegin/231/basefrom
fegin wants to merge 3 commits intogh/fegin/231/basefrom
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/125334
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 9cd89e4 with merge base 746da87 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This was referenced May 1, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "The failing tests are not related." |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
Summary: Right now DCP only flatten a mapping (e.g., dict) if that mapping has tensor objects. This behavior is odd as users may save different non-tensor objects on different ranks. Without flattening the mappings, we may lose these non-tensor objects. One use case is dataloader state_dict. We may also want to do so for a list/tuple. But this will cause extra pickles. So we don't do this for now. Pull Request resolved: #125335 Approved by: https://github.com/LucasLLC, https://github.com/wz337 ghstack dependencies: #125333, #125501, #125334
mvpatel2000
pushed a commit
to mvpatel2000/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
Summary: distributed_state_dict should not try to use `getattr` to get `_extra_state` as this is not well-defined. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#125336 Approved by: https://github.com/LucasLLC ghstack dependencies: pytorch#125333, pytorch#125501, pytorch#125334, pytorch#125335
atalman
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
* [DSD] Correctly handle _extra_state (#125336) Summary: distributed_state_dict should not try to use `getattr` to get `_extra_state` as this is not well-defined. Pull Request resolved: #125336 Approved by: https://github.com/LucasLLC ghstack dependencies: #125333, #125501, #125334, #125335 * lint * lint --------- Co-authored-by: Chien-Chin Huang <chienchin@fb.com> Co-authored-by: Andrey Talman <atalman@fb.com>
antoinebrl
pushed a commit
to antoinebrl/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
…ytorch#125337) Summary: Fixes pytorch#122792 state_dict includes only persistent buffers, while named_buffers() would include non_persistent buffers. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#125337 Approved by: https://github.com/awgu ghstack dependencies: pytorch#125333, pytorch#125501, pytorch#125334, pytorch#125335, pytorch#125336
huydhn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
…125337) (#127219) * [DSD] Fix to remove non_persistent buffer in distributed state dict (#125337) Summary: Fixes #122792 state_dict includes only persistent buffers, while named_buffers() would include non_persistent buffers. Pull Request resolved: #125337 Approved by: https://github.com/awgu ghstack dependencies: #125333, #125501, #125334, #125335, #125336 * lintrunner * lint --------- Co-authored-by: Chien-Chin Huang <chienchin@fb.com> Co-authored-by: Andrey Talman <atalman@fb.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary:
If an object only exists on certain non-coordinator ranks, we still need to save them. Otherwise, we lose these objects. If they are duplicated, DCP will deduplicate them.
cc @mrshenli @pritamdamania87 @zhaojuanmao @satgera @rohan-varma @gqchen @aazzolini @osalpekar @jiayisuse @H-Huang @kwen2501 @awgu @penguinwu @XilunWu @wanchaol @fduwjj @wz337 @tianyu-l @wconstab @yf225 @chauhang @d4l3k @LucasLLC