Skip to content

[Inductor Cutlass backend] Move tests to separate file#121489

Closed
kadeng wants to merge 3 commits into
gh/kadeng/39/basefrom
gh/kadeng/39/head
Closed

[Inductor Cutlass backend] Move tests to separate file#121489
kadeng wants to merge 3 commits into
gh/kadeng/39/basefrom
gh/kadeng/39/head

Conversation

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Mar 8, 2024
@pytorch-bot

pytorch-bot Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/121489

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 6f1d64b with merge base 86a2d67 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Move Cutlass backend related tests to test/inductor/test_cutlass_backend.py - no changes to the tests themselves.


[ghstack-poisoned]
@kadeng kadeng requested review from aakhundov and jansel March 11, 2024 11:42
@kadeng kadeng marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2024 11:43
@kadeng kadeng requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2024 11:43
@aakhundov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kadeng there are 14 failing jobs, but I don't see as many in the trunk: https://hud.pytorch.org/ . Could you rebase, maybe onto viable/strict?

@jansel jansel left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming this is moving stuff around now changing anything

Move Cutlass backend related tests to test/inductor/test_cutlass_backend.py - no changes to the tests themselves.


[ghstack-poisoned]
@kadeng

kadeng commented Mar 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@kadeng there are 14 failing jobs, but I don't see as many in the trunk: https://hud.pytorch.org/ . Could you rebase, maybe onto viable/strict?

Did that by cherry-picking on top of a recent clean viable/strict checkout, CI is running again.

@kadeng

kadeng commented Mar 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 12, 2024
@pytorchmergebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: inductor topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants