Skip to content

Support setup.cfg use rather than setup.py #245

@altendky

Description

@altendky

I honestly don't know what form an implementation of this would take nor whether the system allows a reasonable solution presently. But... There is a shift towards setup.cfg over setup.py. I am unaware of any way to define command classes in setup.cfg. Maybe something relating to in-tree backends? Though I'm not sure how you nicely compose those for projects with their own. And sure, by the time you include an in-tree backend, perhaps you are losing a chunk of the value of static setup.cfg files.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions