Skip to content

Conversation

@asvetlov
Copy link
Contributor

@asvetlov asvetlov commented Oct 13, 2018

return {t for t in _all_tasks
# NB: set(_all_tasks) is required to protect
# from https://bugs.python.org/issue34970 bug
return {t for t in set(_all_tasks)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make it a list() call instead of set()?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 97cf082 into python:master Oct 13, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @asvetlov for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
…pythonGH-9837)

https://bugs.python.org/issue34970
(cherry picked from commit 97cf082)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-9849 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the issue-34970 branch October 13, 2018 18:13
asvetlov added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
…GH-9837) (GH-9849)

https://bugs.python.org/issue34970
(cherry picked from commit 97cf082)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
ned-deily pushed a commit to ned-deily/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic-asyncio type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants