bpo-45655: Add "relevant PEPs" section to typing documentation#29280
bpo-45655: Add "relevant PEPs" section to typing documentation#29280ambv merged 4 commits intopython:mainfrom
typing documentation#29280Conversation
The list of PEPs at the top of the documentation for the ``typing`` module has become too long to be readable. This PR proposes presenting this information in a more structured and readable way by adding a new "relevant PEPs" section to the ``typing`` docs.
|
We can backport to 3.9 but we need to modify the backport to remove 3.10 PEPs. |
|
Thanks @AlexWaygood for the PR, and @ambv for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9, 3.10. |
…ythonGH-29280) The list of PEPs at the top of the documentation for the ``typing`` module has become too long to be readable. This PR proposes presenting this information in a more structured and readable way by adding a new "relevant PEPs" section to the ``typing`` docs. Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl> (cherry picked from commit 03db1bb) Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
|
Sorry, @AlexWaygood and @ambv, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
GH-29290 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
|
@AlexWaygood, since the change is already conflicting, can you recreate it manually against 3.9? |
Sure, I'll have a go! (Thanks for the lightning speed in merging! 😀) |
Backport of python#29280 to the 3.9 branch.
3.9 backport here #29297 😊 |
…tion Backport of python#29280 to the 3.10 branch.
This backport has been closed in favour of #29302, which is a new backport to the 3.10 branch |
The list of PEPs at the top of the documentation for the
typingmodule hasbecome too long to be readable. This PR proposes presenting this
information in a more structured and readable way by adding a new "relevant
PEPs" section to the
typingdocs.https://bugs.python.org/issue45655