-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
bpo-36540: Improve doc of function definition regarding positional-only arguments #25235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thanks @gousaiyang for the PR, and @pablogsal for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9. |
|
Thanks for the PR! |
|
Sorry @gousaiyang and @pablogsal, I had trouble checking out the |
|
@gousaiyang Could you do the backport manually by using |
|
GH-25259 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
…nal-only arguments (pythonGH-25235) (cherry picked from commit 58d72ca) Co-authored-by: Saiyang Gou <gousaiyang@163.com>
…nal-only arguments (pythonGH-25235) (cherry picked from commit 58d72ca) Co-authored-by: Saiyang Gou <gousaiyang@163.com>
|
Done. And I also created #25260 to backport this to 3.8 (if needed). |
|
Awesome, thanks! |
Better document the positional-only arguments feature in the "Function definitions" section.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36540