Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-36797: Reduce levels of indirection in outdated distutils docs (GH-13462) #13524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
miss-islington merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2019
Merged

[3.7] bpo-36797: Reduce levels of indirection in outdated distutils docs (GH-13462) #13524

miss-islington merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2019

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 23, 2019 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

(cherry picked from commit e788057)

Co-authored-by: Nick Coghlan ncoghlan@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue36797

@ncoghlan @miss-islington
bpo-36797: Reduce levels of indirection in outdated distutils docs (p…
a61f37c 
…ythonGH-13462)

(cherry picked from commit e788057)

Co-authored-by: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request May 23, 2019
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 23, 2019
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

ncoghlan commented May 23, 2019 •
edited
Loading

@jaraco Only the fact that any existing unqualified deep links will end up somewhere more useful than a 404 page.

@ewdurbin Do we have any page level metrics for docs.python.org that could potentially let us be more ruthless in pruning apparently unreferenced pages?

@ewdurbin
Copy link
Member

ewdurbin commented May 23, 2019

@ewdurbin Do we have any page level metrics for docs.python.org that could potentially let us be more ruthless in pruning apparently unreferenced pages?

Best thing we have is raw access logs from CDN edge. The question is how to consume them.

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

ncoghlan commented May 23, 2019

@ewdurbin It's one of those things that bugs me a bit, as I find it hard to believe this is a novel problem to face, but my attempts to find any discussions of good ways to go about it don't turn up anything useful :P

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented May 23, 2019

@ncoghlan: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit a3488e5 into python:3.7 May 23, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-e788057-3.7 branch May 23, 2019 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ncoghlan ncoghlan ncoghlan approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@miss-islington @ncoghlan @ewdurbin @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot