Skip to content

check for invalid validators#140

Merged
samuelcolvin merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
validator-checks
Mar 25, 2018
Merged

check for invalid validators#140
samuelcolvin merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
validator-checks

Conversation

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fix #103, ref #137

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 25, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #140 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #140   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           9      9           
  Lines         879    893   +14     
  Branches      197    199    +2     
=====================================
+ Hits          879    893   +14

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin merged commit a809695 into master Mar 25, 2018
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin deleted the validator-checks branch March 25, 2018 15:41
alexdrydew pushed a commit to alexdrydew/pydantic that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2023
* fix recursion cycle edge case

* improve validator names

* simplifying validator names

* all tests passing

* implementing complete via RefCell - failed

* names working correctly

* fixing all validator names

* function names and testing function recursion

* correct dict validator name

* backup recursion guard, fix pydantic#143

* cleanup

* fix rust benchmarks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check for invalid field names in validators

1 participant