Skip to content

Add extra parameter to the validate functions#12233

Merged
davidhewitt merged 1 commit intopydantic:mainfrom
anvilpete:validate-extra
Oct 5, 2025
Merged

Add extra parameter to the validate functions#12233
davidhewitt merged 1 commit intopydantic:mainfrom
anvilpete:validate-extra

Conversation

@anvilpete
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@anvilpete anvilpete commented Sep 7, 2025 •
edited by pydantic-hooky Bot
Loading

Change Summary

This PR depends on the following PR in pydantic-core: pydantic/pydantic-core#1722.

This change adds an extra parameter to the validation functions, overriding any other model configuration.

SomeModel(BaseModel):
    my_field: int
    model_config = ConfigDict(extra="allow")

data = SomeModel.model_validate(
    {"myfield": 1, "extra field": 2},
    extra="forbid"  # override model config and forbid extra fields just this time
)

Related issue number

feature #9278

Checklist

  • The pull request title is a good summary of the changes - it will be used in the changelog
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

Selected Reviewer: @DouweM

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the relnotes-fix Used for bugfixes. label Sep 7, 2025
@anvilpete anvilpete mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025
Merged
4 tasks
@azmeuk azmeuk mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2025
Open
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Oct 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

FileStatementsMissingCoverageCoverage
(new stmts)		Lines missing
  pydantic
  config.py
  main.py
  type_adapter.py
  pydantic/plugin
  __init__.py
Project Total  

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Oct 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #12233 will improve performances by 23.71%

Comparing anvilpete:validate-extra (da9ba3f) with main (af271da)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvement
✅ 45 untouched

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
⚡ test_failed_rebuild 267.8 µs 216.5 µs +23.71%

@anvilpete anvilpete marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2025 18:26
@anvilpete
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

anvilpete commented Oct 1, 2025

Please review. This PR requires the recent pydantic-core 2.40.0 release, so I've included the version bump and test fixes.

davidhewitt
davidhewitt approved these changes Oct 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@davidhewitt davidhewitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this looks good to me. The pydantic-core version got bumped separately, so if you rebase on main the diff should be possible to clean up a fair bit.

@Viicos Viicos removed the relnotes-fix Used for bugfixes. label Oct 5, 2025
@anvilpete
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

anvilpete commented Oct 5, 2025

Thanks for your quick review, ready to merge now I think. Resolves #9278.

@davidhewitt davidhewitt linked an issue Oct 5, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Configure behavior for extra fields at runtime / validation time #9278
Closed
13 tasks
@davidhewitt davidhewitt merged commit e49d758 into pydantic:main Oct 5, 2025
63 checks passed
@Viicos Viicos added needs-blogpost-entry This PR needs to be documented in the release notes blog post and removed ready for review labels Oct 6, 2025
@antoniojkim antoniojkim mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2026
Open
1 task
@davidhewitt davidhewitt mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2026
Open
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@davidhewitt davidhewitt davidhewitt approved these changes

Assignees

@DouweM DouweM

@Viicos Viicos

Labels

needs-blogpost-entry This PR needs to be documented in the release notes blog post relnotes-feature

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Configure behavior for extra fields at runtime / validation time

4 participants

@anvilpete @davidhewitt @DouweM @Viicos