STY: Use the UserAccessPermissions enum#2398
Merged
MartinThoma merged 3 commits intomainfrom Jan 6, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2398 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.35% 94.34% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 43 43
Lines 7577 7569 -8
Branches 1519 1520 +1
==========================================
- Hits 7149 7141 -8
Misses 265 265
Partials 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
MartinThoma
commented
Jan 6, 2024
Comment on lines
+1817
to
+1820
| "copy": UserAccessPermissions.EXTRACT, | ||
| "annotations": UserAccessPermissions.ADD_OR_MODIFY, | ||
| "forms": UserAccessPermissions.R7, | ||
| "accessability": UserAccessPermissions.EXTRACT_TEXT_AND_GRAPHICS, |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't even know if the string versions are correct.
Collaborator
|
R7 is incorrectly mapped here, as already stated in #2391.
|
MartinThoma
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2024
## What's new pypdf==4.0.0 is a big milestone forward: * We finally have a layout-mode text extraction. This enables users who want to detect / extract tables with heuristics to give it a try. * We deprecated a lot of the old PyPDF2 API that was either not following PEP8 naming styles or was not using a property. Users comming from PyPDF2 might want to switch first to pypdf<4.0.0 to get helpful error messages that show the new API in their speicific cases. A big 'Thank you!' the the whole pypdf community for your work. Thanks to you, pypdf is better than ever. Kudos to @shartzog who added the layout-mode with his first contribution! ### Deprecations (DEP) - Drop Python 3.6 support (#2369) by @MartinThoma - Remove deprecated code (#2367) by @MartinThoma - Remove deprecated XMP properties (#2386) by @stefan6419846 ### New Features (ENH) - Add "layout" mode for text extraction (#2388) by @shartzog - Add Jupyter Notebook integration for PdfReader (#2375) by @MartinThoma - Improve/rewrite PDF permission retrieval (#2400) by @stefan6419846 ### Bug Fixes (BUG) - PdfWriter.add_uri was setting the wrong type (#2406) by @pmiller66 - Add support for GBK2K cmaps (#2385) by @stefan6419846 ### Documentation (DOC) - Add pmiller66 for #2406 as a contributor by @MartinThoma - Add missing expand parameter (#2393) by @Atomnp - Resolve build warnings (#2380) by @stefan6419846 - Fix testing prerequisites (#2381) by @stefan6419846 - Improve formatting of contributors page (#2383) by @stefan6419846 - Add Tobeabellwether as a contributor for #2341 by @MartinThoma ### Developer Experience (DEV) - Make dependabot aware of our PR prefixes (#2415) by @stefan6419846 - Fail on Sphinx issues (#2405) by @stefan6419846 - Move title check to own workflow (#2384) by @MasterOdin - Write to temporary files instead of the working directory (#2379) by @stefan6419846 - Ensure that the PR titles have the correct format (#2378) by @stefan6419846 ### Maintenance (MAINT) - Complete FileSpecificationDictionaryEntries constants (#2416) by @MartinThoma - Return None instead of -1 when page is not attached (#2376) by @MartinThoma - Replace warning with logging.error (#2377) by @MartinThoma ### Testing (TST) - Add missing pytest.mark.samples annotations (#2412) by @kitterma - Correctly close temporary files (#2396) by @stefan6419846 - Fix side effect #2379 (#2395) by @pubpub-zz - Add test for layout extraction mode (#2390) by @MartinThoma ### Code Style (STY) - Use the UserAccessPermissions enum (#2398) by @MartinThoma - Run black (#2370) by @MartinThoma [Full Changelog](3.17.4...4.0.0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've noticed this while going over #2391.
It's a minor cleanup, before we deprecate it in favor of a property exposing an int flag like this:
Then we would return a better datastructure + we could expose this as a property with which users could interact in a clearer way.