Skip to content

model: Remove json-iterator usage (again)#453

Merged
beorn7 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
beorn7/model
Mar 1, 2023
Merged

model: Remove json-iterator usage (again)#453
beorn7 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
beorn7/model

Conversation

@beorn7
Copy link
Member

@beorn7 beorn7 commented Feb 23, 2023

This seemingly undoes #440, but all the json-iterator usage was actually pulled up into client_golang in
prometheus/client_golang#1225 . Detailed explanation there. In short, we would like to keep heavy dependencies like json-iterator out of prometheus/common/model since many importers of this package aren't even interested in the JSON marshaling.

@beorn7 beorn7 requested a review from codesome February 23, 2023 22:07
@beorn7
Copy link
Member Author

beorn7 commented Feb 23, 2023

@zenador as discussed. I believe, together with prometheus/client_golang#1225 , this should still work out in Mimir. To try it out, just make sure you have vendored in both PRs.

@SuperQ
Copy link
Member

SuperQ commented Feb 25, 2023

This needs a rebase to update the go.sum.

This seemingly undoes #440, but all the json-iterator usage was
actually pulled up into client_golang in
prometheus/client_golang#1225 . Detailed
explanation there. In short, we would like to keep heavy dependencies
like json-iterator out of prometheus/common/model since many importers
of this package aren't even interested in the JSON marshaling.

Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
@beorn7
Copy link
Member Author

beorn7 commented Feb 28, 2023

OK, rebased. I will only merge this once prometheus/client_golang#1225 is approved.

@beorn7
Copy link
Member Author

beorn7 commented Mar 1, 2023

With prometheus/client_golang#1225 approved, I'll execute the following steps now:

@beorn7 beorn7 merged commit 94c865c into main Mar 1, 2023
@beorn7 beorn7 deleted the beorn7/model branch March 1, 2023 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants