Size Change: +58 B (0%)

Total Size: 38.2 kB

_{compressed-size-action}

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 99.808% when pulling 8c7149b on nested-children into 427b4ea on master.

Could save a byte (and a map-loop) when invoking fn inside the reduce callback or am I missing sth.?

	return toChildArray(children)
 		.reduce((acc, value) => acc.concat(fn(value)), []);

@sventschui Super awesome, that is a lot better 💯 I had a hunch that the current solution wasn't as optimal as it should be 👍