support PartitionTableScan in TiFlash#3876
Conversation
|
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsReviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
f8e52b6 to
568b6a0
Compare
ab82cce to
d621cd6
Compare
d621cd6 to
195894e
Compare
|
/run-all-tests |
Coverage for changed filesCoverage summaryfull coverage report (for internal network access only) |
af699d5 to
0c80e6b
Compare
0c80e6b to
dd49eac
Compare
dd49eac to
a53ec53
Compare
6d87e1d to
b78aff1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| TablesRegionsInfo tables_regions_info = TablesRegionsInfo::create(cop_request->regions(), cop_request->table_regions(), cop_context.db_context.getTMTContext()); | |
| auto tables_regions_info = TablesRegionsInfo::create(cop_request->regions(), cop_request->table_regions(), cop_context.db_context.getTMTContext()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
how about check all schemas the same under debug mode?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
got it. btw I found tidb_table_ids and tiflash_table_ids are more readable to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what will happen if tidb mistakenly sent duplicated ids to tiflash? use set and check it?
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
01cce83 to
f7065bf
Compare
|
/cancel hold |
|
/merge |
|
@windtalker: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
|
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. DetailsCommit hash: f7065bf |
|
/run-all-tests |
|
/rebuild |
1 similar comment
|
/rebuild |
|
/run-integration-tests |
Coverage for changed filesCoverage summaryfull coverage report (for internal network access only) |
close pingcap#3873 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> update. Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> update. Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> Split write and ingest throughput (pingcap#4245) close pingcap#4243 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> fix the problem that expired data was not recycled timely due to slow gc speed (pingcap#4224) close pingcap#4146 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> PageStorage: Fix some bugs (pingcap#4212) ref pingcap#3594 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> Make test of CreateTables using affected opts (pingcap#4239) close pingcap#4235 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> BlobStore: remove the old_ids, not need recycle the blob id. (pingcap#4247) ref pingcap#3594 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> support `PartitionTableScan` in TiFlash (pingcap#3876) close pingcap#3873 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> update. Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> update. Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com> support last_day and dayofmonth pushdown to tiflash (pingcap#4183) close pingcap#4149 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <592838129@qq.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #3873
Problem Summary:
As the issue described.
What is changed and how it works?
This is the TiFlash part of #3873, the main changes include
TiDBTableScanto hide the different ofTableScanandPartitionTableScanPartitionTableScaninDAGStorageInterpreterPartitionTableScanindbgFunctionCoprocessorCheck List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note