*: add show push down for ShowTables#31919
Conversation
|
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsReviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
|
Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/cf0d9ab8afd33c4717c026052aadb1cd6ab16412 |
|
/run-mysql-test |
c0a1e18 to
fe13415
Compare
|
/run-mysql-test |
|
/run-unit-test |
1 similar comment
|
/run-unit-test |
|
/run-unit-test |
|
/run-check_dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't quite understand. Why do you need this logic of !collate.NewCollationEnabled()? Please help to explain it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is copied from planner/core/expression_rewriter.go:1634.
Treat predicate 'like' the same way as predicate '=' when it is an exact match and new collation is not enabled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could remove this if statement, then use CompileLike2Regexp directly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, I will remove NewCollationEnabled condition. but IsExactMatch still retained. Equal is faster than regexp.
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
Co-authored-by: Lynn <zimu_xia@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
d610b15 to
8245dc2
Compare
|
/merge |
|
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. DetailsCommit hash: 8245dc2 |
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
|
cherry pick to release-5.4 in PR #33338 |
| continue | ||
| } else if FieldFilterEnable && v.Meta().Name.L != fieldFilter { | ||
| continue | ||
| } else if fieldPatternsRegexp != nil && !fieldPatternsRegexp.MatchString(v.Meta().Name.L) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't get it. Can we use the original string of meta info instead of the lower case string to match the pattern? Plz help to explain it. @hawkingrei
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang wangweizhen@pingcap.com
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #30803
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note