I think the regex is not complete. The printf format is %[argnum$][flags][width][.precision]

• Argument number is a little strange for this use case but the support should be there.
• Other use cases: https://3v4l.org/u0vgj

I think the regex is not complete. The printf format is %[argnum$][flags][width][.precision]

absolutely. I did a first step with this PR which covers the initially reported issues.
I am fine with adding more coverage though, but the PR as is already provides value IMO.

Do you think something like this makes sense as well?

Do you think something like this makes sense as well?

I guess it depends on which use-cases the added complexity will cover. might be easier to think about it, when seeing actual NodeScopeResolverTest-cases

@ondrejmirtes just rebased and it should be good to go

I will work on the mentioned features/comments in separate followup PRs regarding

Do you think something like this makes sense as well?

and

I think the regex is not complete. The printf format is %[argnum$][flags][width][.precision]

* Argument number is a little strange for this use case but the support should be there.

Thank you.