Skip to content

allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents#9

Merged
pbrisbin merged 1 commit intopbrisbin:masterfrom
gregwebs:master
Dec 31, 2012
Merged

allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents#9
pbrisbin merged 1 commit intopbrisbin:masterfrom
gregwebs:master

Conversation

@gregwebs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Isn't it dangerous to have no upper limit?

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Eh, I guess all we rely on is the PersistField type class, and I don't see that as likely to change in a breaking way.

pbrisbin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2012
allow persistent 1.1 & future persistents
@pbrisbin pbrisbin merged commit 0d588aa into pbrisbin:master Dec 31, 2012
@gregwebs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

yep, exactly. We can always place an upper bound in the rare event that it breaks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants