Skip to content

refactor(linter/no-hooks): fix typo in diagnostic function#17750

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/01-07-refactor_linter_no-hooks_fix_typo_in_diagnostic_function
Jan 7, 2026
Merged

refactor(linter/no-hooks): fix typo in diagnostic function#17750
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
c/01-07-refactor_linter_no-hooks_fix_typo_in_diagnostic_function

Conversation

@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 commented Jan 7, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Jan 7, 2026
@camc314 camc314 marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2026 14:43
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 7, 2026 14:43
@camc314 Graphite App
Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Jan 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@camc314 camc314 mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2026
Merged
@camc314 camc314 self-assigned this Jan 7, 2026
Copilot AI reviewed Jan 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes a spelling error in the function name within the no_hooks linter rule, correcting "diagonsitc" to "diagnostic".

  • Renamed unexpected_hook_diagonsitc to unexpected_hook_diagnostic in both the function definition and its call site

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jan 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the c/01-07-refactor_linter_no-hooks_fix_typo_in_diagnostic_function branch from a7bf104 to 1062bbe Compare January 7, 2026 14:48
@camc314 camc314 added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Jan 7, 2026
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 1062bbe into main Jan 7, 2026
20 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the c/01-07-refactor_linter_no-hooks_fix_typo_in_diagnostic_function branch January 7, 2026 14:53
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Jan 7, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 7, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Comparing c/01-07-refactor_linter_no-hooks_fix_typo_in_diagnostic_function (1062bbe) with main (c7f0848)1

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 41 skipped benchmarks2

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (1062bbe) during the generation of this report, so c7f0848 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

  2. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

Assignees

@camc314 camc314

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@camc314