Skip to content

Bug 2037208: handle arm64#5480

Merged
jmrodri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:masterfrom
jmrodri:bug2037208
Aug 24, 2022
Merged

Bug 2037208: handle arm64#5480
jmrodri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:masterfrom
jmrodri:bug2037208

Conversation

@jmrodri

@jmrodri jmrodri commented Jan 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • update Makefiles
  • regenerate samples using the new update

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez jesusr@redhat.com

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Jan 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold

needs changelog

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 7, 2022
@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Jan 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 7, 2022

@ryantking ryantking left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, tested with darwin's default sed, which is different from GNU's.

@asmacdo asmacdo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2022
@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Feb 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold
there is one scenario that I think is broken. Will verify and remove hold.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 7, 2022
@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Feb 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The scenario is that we try to download opm and there was no arm64 opm until release 1.20.

@joelanford

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/approve

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 1, 2022
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 1, 2022
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot closed this Jul 31, 2022
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Aug 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I will retest this PR and reopen.

@jmrodri jmrodri reopened this Aug 1, 2022
* update Makefiles
* regenerate samples using the new update
* add changelog describing the change

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 24, 2022
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@jmrodri

jmrodri commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 24, 2022
@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit 7ff9007 into operator-framework:master Aug 24, 2022
dacamposol pushed a commit to dacamposol/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
* update Makefiles
* regenerate samples using the new update
* add changelog describing the change

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Campos Olivares <daniel.campos.olivares@sap.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants