-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11k
Fix up some undocumented commands issues #9974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
I think I want to add all the missing "for comment ifdef"'s today. I can do it as part of this PR. |
|
Rebased, added all commands #ifdef options, and squashed. This can be merged. |
|
Removed renaming the two POD files since that is now handled, more completely, in PR #10000 |
|
Ping for second review. My approval still holds. |
Make find-doc-nits understand that
=for comment ifdef ssl3 ...
in a POD page means that the "-ssl3" flag might be ifdef'd out in the
local environment, and not to complain about it.
|
And still holds. |
|
This is ready to merge; the "pending 2nd review" label is outdated. |
Make find-doc-nits understand that
=for comment ifdef ssl3 ...
in a POD page means that the "-ssl3" flag might be ifdef'd out in the
local environment, and not to complain about it.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from #9974)
|
Merged. 1738c0c Add '=for comment ifdef' to pod pages |
Make find-doc-nits understand that
=for comment ifdef ssl3
in a POD page means that the "-ssl3" command might be ifdef'd out in the
local environment, and not to complain about it.
Added a handful of those lines to pages that complain for me.
Additional flags will probably have to be added.