fix the manifests generation#533
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
|
Is there an issue that this is a regression in version numbering? Does it matter? |
tmshort
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
So, it shouldn't be considered a regression
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, stevekuznetsov, tmshort The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
@stevekuznetsov: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
manifests: use the CVO-replaced placeholder for version
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov skuznets@redhat.com
makefile: verify that we use the CVO-based placeholder
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov skuznets@redhat.com