OCPBUGS-61471: [release-4.12] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind by anik120 · Pull Request #1054 · openshift/operator-framework-olm

anik120 · 2025-08-20T17:56:43Z

Manual cherry-pick of #1047

Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@gmail.com> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: 919aefdce3f4d6b77c3872df249815d20749db94

Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: d7aaeb11ab80f862fc9c70dfb7865158bb67e28c

openshift-ci · 2025-08-20T17:57:42Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS~~ [anik120]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

…s namespace

perdasilva · 2025-08-21T06:32:39Z

/retest

perdasilva · 2025-08-21T08:50:20Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

anik120 · 2025-08-21T13:27:27Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

anik120 · 2025-08-21T19:45:46Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

perdasilva · 2025-08-25T08:04:05Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

perdasilva · 2025-08-25T13:48:01Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

oceanc80 · 2025-08-25T15:39:53Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

anik120 · 2025-08-27T13:38:50Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

perdasilva · 2025-08-29T07:17:21Z

/test e2e-gcp-olm

Xia-Zhao-rh · 2025-08-29T08:14:13Z

Test PASS

/label qe-approved

xzha@xzha1-mac OCP-82135 % oc get networkpolicy -A
NAMESPACE             NAME                    POD-SELECTOR                       AGE
openshift-operators   default-allow-all       <none>                             30m
test-1                default-deny-all        <none>                             14s
test-1                nginx82135-controller   control-plane=controller-manager   14s

jianzhangbjz · 2025-09-09T09:02:35Z

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-09-09T09:02:47Z

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jianzhangbjz · 2025-09-09T09:02:55Z

/lgtm

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T09:03:30Z

/test all

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T10:16:12Z

/override ci/prow/verify

we're ok with these staging changes

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T10:16:24Z

/test e2e-gcp-console-olm

openshift-ci · 2025-09-09T10:17:20Z

@perdasilva: Overrode contexts on behalf of perdasilva: ci/prow/verify

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify

we're ok with these staging changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T11:18:38Z

/retest

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T12:10:00Z

/retest

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T13:16:35Z

/retest

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T18:03:01Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2025-09-09T20:15:40Z

@anik120: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/verify	`20f2686`	link	true	`/test verify`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

perdasilva · 2025-09-09T20:34:05Z

/retitle OCPBUGS-61471: [release-4.12] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-09-09T20:34:14Z

@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61471, which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry-pick of #1047

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

perdasilva · 2025-09-10T07:09:51Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-09-10T07:09:55Z

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61471, which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

perdasilva · 2025-09-10T07:10:11Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-09-10T07:10:20Z

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61471, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.12.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.z)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61470 targets the "4.13.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.13.0, 4.13.z
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @Xia-Zhao-rh

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-09-10T07:13:12Z

@anik120: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61471
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61471 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry-pick of #1047

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-bot · 2025-09-14T07:26:29Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: operator-registry
This PR has been included in build operator-registry-container-v4.12.0-202509140600.p0.gfb533b0.assembly.stream.el8.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-09-14T07:56:46Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager
This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.12.0-202509140600.p0.gfb533b0.assembly.stream.el8.
All builds following this will include this PR.

rashmigottipati and others added 2 commits August 20, 2025 13:55

Upstream: 1675: Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind

3c34faa

Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@gmail.com> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: 919aefdce3f4d6b77c3872df249815d20749db94

Upstream: 3580: add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind

ca9e4d1

Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: d7aaeb11ab80f862fc9c70dfb7865158bb67e28c

openshift-ci Bot requested review from grokspawn and perdasilva August 20, 2025 17:57

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2025

Upstream: <carry>: Add allow-all networkpolicy for openshift-operator…

20f2686

…s namespace

anik120 force-pushed the np-backport-4.12 branch from 0934137 to 20f2686 Compare August 20, 2025 20:12

openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 25, 2025

openshift-ci Bot assigned bandrade, emmajiafan, jianzhangbjz, KeenonLee, kuiwang02 and Xia-Zhao-rh Aug 25, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 29, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 9, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2025

openshift-ci Bot changed the title ~~[release-4.12] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind~~ OCPBUGS-61471: [release-4.12] Add NetworkPolicy as a supported kind Sep 9, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 9, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 10, 2025

openshift-ci Bot requested a review from Xia-Zhao-rh September 10, 2025 07:10

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit fb533b0 into openshift:release-4.12 Sep 10, 2025
13 checks passed

Conversation

anik120 commented Aug 20, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 20, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Aug 21, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Aug 21, 2025

Uh oh!

anik120 commented Aug 21, 2025

Uh oh!

anik120 commented Aug 21, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Aug 25, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Aug 25, 2025

Uh oh!

oceanc80 commented Aug 25, 2025

Uh oh!

anik120 commented Aug 27, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Aug 29, 2025

Uh oh!

Xia-Zhao-rh commented Aug 29, 2025

Uh oh!

jianzhangbjz commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

jianzhangbjz commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

perdasilva commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

12 participants