Skip to content

OCPBUGS-87448: Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#93

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-csi-livenessprobe
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-87448: Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0#93
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
openshift-bot:art-consistency-openshift-5.0-csi-livenessprobe

Conversation

@openshift-bot

@openshift-bot openshift-bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
csi-livenessprobe.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot force-pushed the art-consistency-openshift-5.0-csi-livenessprobe branch from e3ea84a to ad834fc Compare June 7, 2026 08:27
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

CI and container build configurations are updated to use Go 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0 as the build and runtime bases, replacing Go 1.25 and OpenShift 4.22 tags across the CI operator configuration and Dockerfile.

Changes

Build Infrastructure Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Go and OpenShift version updates
.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp
CI operator build root image and Dockerfile multi-stage builder and runtime base images are updated from OpenShift 4.22/Go 1.25 to OpenShift 5.0/Go 1.26.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR only modifies build configuration files (.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp); no Ginkgo tests or test code changes. Custom check for Ginkgo test naming is not applicable.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR contains only configuration changes (.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp); no test code modifications or Ginkgo test files are present in the changeset.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR. Changes are limited to CI/build configuration (.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp) and infrastructure files. Check not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR modifies only build configuration and Dockerfile. No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so SNO compatibility check does not apply.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR modifies only CI/build configuration files (.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp), not deployment manifests or operator code that could introduce topology scheduling constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR only changes infrastructure files (.ci-operator.yaml, Dockerfile.ocp). No code modifications. Existing code uses component-base logging properly configured for stderr.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR updates CI configuration and Dockerfiles for OpenShift 5.0. No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so IPv6/disconnected network check is not applicable.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR contains only infrastructure/config updates (image versions) with no cryptographic code changes. No MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, ECB usage found in source or new code.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR only updates builder/base image tags in Dockerfile.ocp and .ci-operator.yaml; no privilege escalation settings or root user instructions introduced or modified.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PR only modifies CI/build configuration files. No code changes introduce logging statements, and existing logs contain no sensitive data.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title accurately describes the main objective: updating the csi-livenessprobe-container image configuration for OpenShift 5.0 consistency with ART, which matches the changes to both .ci-operator.yaml and Dockerfile.ocp.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot changed the title Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 OCPBUGS-87448: Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0 Jun 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 7, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from mpatlasov and rhrmo June 7, 2026 08:27
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87448, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
csi-livenessprobe.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87448, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
csi-livenessprobe.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
  • Updated build and runtime environments to use Golang 1.26 and OpenShift 5.0.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@Dockerfile.ocp`:
- Line 1: The Dockerfile uses an unapproved base image
registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0; replace
the FROM line for the builder stage to use an approved UBI minimal or distroless
image hosted on catalog.redhat.com (e.g., a UBI minimal Golang builder or
appropriate distroless variant) and update any stage name references (builder)
accordingly; ensure the new image tag is the approved productized tag from
catalog.redhat.com and verify any subsequent build artifacts remain compatible
with the new base.
- Around line 6-8: The final stage runs as root because there is no USER
instruction; modify the Dockerfile to create or use a non-root user and set USER
before ENTRYPOINT (e.g., add a RUN that creates a low-privilege user/group and
chowns /usr/bin/livenessprobe if needed, then add USER <username|UID> before
ENTRYPOINT). Ensure the change applies to the final stage that contains COPY
--from=builder /go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe
/usr/bin/ and the ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"] so the container runs
non-root.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: f28acc1f-7ea1-4a72-bad7-fdbd47f2abc4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d5e959 and ad834fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .ci-operator.yaml
  • Dockerfile.ocp

Comment thread Dockerfile.ocp
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.25-openshift-4.22 AS builder
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0 AS builder

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Use approved Red Hat base images from catalog.redhat.com per container policy.

The updated FROM images are not using the required UBI minimal or distroless source from catalog.redhat.com, so this change violates the repository container-security standard.

As per coding guidelines, "Base image: UBI minimal or distroless from catalog.redhat.com."

Also applies to: 6-6

🧰 Tools
🪛 Trivy (0.69.3)

[error] 1-1: Image user should not be 'root'

Specify at least 1 USER command in Dockerfile with non-root user as argument

Rule: DS-0002

Learn more

(IaC/Dockerfile)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile.ocp` at line 1, The Dockerfile uses an unapproved base image
registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/builder:rhel-9-golang-1.26-openshift-5.0; replace
the FROM line for the builder stage to use an approved UBI minimal or distroless
image hosted on catalog.redhat.com (e.g., a UBI minimal Golang builder or
appropriate distroless variant) and update any stage name references (builder)
accordingly; ensure the new image tag is the approved productized tag from
catalog.redhat.com and verify any subsequent build artifacts remain compatible
with the new base.

Source: Coding guidelines

Comment thread Dockerfile.ocp
Comment on lines +6 to 8
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9
COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe /usr/bin/
ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Set a non-root runtime user in the final stage.

The final image has no USER instruction, so it runs as root by default. Please set an explicit non-root user before ENTRYPOINT.

Suggested patch
 FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9
 COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe /usr/bin/
+USER 65532
 ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"]

As per coding guidelines, "USER non-root; never run as root."

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9
COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe /usr/bin/
ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"]
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/5.0:base-rhel9
COPY --from=builder /go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe /usr/bin/
USER 65532
ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"]
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Dockerfile.ocp` around lines 6 - 8, The final stage runs as root because
there is no USER instruction; modify the Dockerfile to create or use a non-root
user and set USER before ENTRYPOINT (e.g., add a RUN that creates a
low-privilege user/group and chowns /usr/bin/livenessprobe if needed, then add
USER <username|UID> before ENTRYPOINT). Ensure the change applies to the final
stage that contains COPY --from=builder
/go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/livenessprobe/bin/livenessprobe /usr/bin/ and
the ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/livenessprobe"] so the container runs non-root.

Sources: Coding guidelines, Linters/SAST tools

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ART wants to connect issue OCPBUGS-87702 to this PR, but found it is currently hooked up to ['OCPBUGS-87448']. Please consult with #forum-ocp-art if it is not clear what there is to do.

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Jun 10, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit f649d2c into openshift:master Jun 10, 2026
11 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87448
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87448 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Updating csi-livenessprobe-container image to be consistent with ART for 5.0
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
csi-livenessprobe.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

  • Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
    tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team
    in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
    introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
    this PR will be closed automatically.
  • In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
    a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
  • Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
    any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
    canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
    only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
    a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
    canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

  • In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
    set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
    To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
  • You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out in the #forum-ocp-art Slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants