Bug 2001977: delete hello-openshift in payload imagestream#393
Conversation
|
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001977, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
sig api machinery flake e2e-aws /retest |
|
if https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976307 is not backported to 4.7 than simple delete of hello-openshift will be our only option |
|
/hold |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@gabemontero: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (jitsingh@redhat.com) for bug 2001977 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
5e3eb34 to
961f4a9
Compare
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001977, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest |
|
/test okd-e2e-aws-builds |
|
hey @vrutkovs - heads up, I'm seeing a bug in the 4.7 version of the OKD version of the imagestream It is missing the "2.7" tag. By comparison, it exists in the master branch: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/blob/master/assets/operator/okd-x86_64/ruby/imagestreams/ruby-centos.json#L103-L123 I see where you updated upstream with sclorg/s2i-ruby-container@4d4a6e7 But my guress is that was after the 4.7 GA. I'm going to go ahead and fix 4.7 with this PR |
|
/hold cancel |
|
@gabemontero: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
ok we now have okd-e2e-aws-build passing now ... the otherokd's passed previously but now hit unrelated flakes /skip |
|
/retest |
|
/assign @coreydaley |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: coreydaley, gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001977, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/hold just for a bit ... double checking the console bits around this imagestream |
|
we need openshift/console#10089 to merge first so that this PR does not break the 4.7 console thanks @spadgett !! |
|
[patch-manager] ⌛ This pull request was not picked by the patch manager for the current z-stream window and have to wait for the next window. skipped for today
NOTE: This message was automatically generated, if you have questions please ask on #forum-release |
|
Should the hold be removed from this one now that openshift/console#10089 has merged? |
|
it should @dhellmann /hold cancel |
|
@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2001977 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/assign @jitendar-singh we need a QA approval label as part of moving forward with this backport of bz you have validated in later versions thanks |
cherry pick failed ... example #380 (comment)
ultimately want to get this back to 4.7 .... see #385 (comment)
/assign @dperaza4dustbit
more tech debt I was still carrying prior to hand off
NOTE: confirmed with @jottofar that the install feature of using an annotation to have CVO delete a given item it manages is not getting backported to 4.7, so we just have to remove the imagestream like we did in 4.8.