Skip to content

Update to k8s 1.34.1#340

Closed
joelsmith wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
joelsmith:master
Closed

Update to k8s 1.34.1#340
joelsmith wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
joelsmith:master

Conversation

@joelsmith
Copy link

go get k8s.io/api@v0.34.1 k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.34.1 k8s.io/client-go@v0.34.1 k8s.io/client-go@v0.34.1 k8s.io/code-generator@v0.34.1
go mod tidy
go mod vendor
make update
go mod tidy
go mod vendor

This should fix build errors where the k8s libraries have been updated but OpenShift is still using the old k8s libraries, like this:

vendor/github.com/openshift/client-go/config/applyconfigurations/config/v1alpha2/insightsdatagather.go:57:55: cannot use internal.Parser().Type("com.github.openshift.api.config.v1alpha2.InsightsDataGather") (value of struct type "sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/typed".ParseableType) as "sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6/typed".ParseableType value in argument to managedfields.ExtractInto

go get k8s.io/api@v0.34.1 k8s.io/apimachinery@v0.34.1 k8s.io/client-go@v0.34.1 k8s.io/client-go@v0.34.1 k8s.io/code-generator@v0.34.1
go mod tidy
go mod vendor
make update
go mod tidy
go mod vendor
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and bertinatto October 3, 2025 17:24
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joelsmith
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bertinatto for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@joelsmith: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Changes look good, but I don't believe we are able to merge this right now

While the 1.34 rebase has not landed on k/k, we cannot update openshift/api to 1.34. Until that happens, bumping client-go to 1.34 would mean that folks would not be able to update o/api and o/client-go together.

While their deps are not in lockstep, this could break development across the org.

Where has this latency affected you?

@joelsmith
Copy link
Author

Where has this latency affected you?

I'm doing the cluster autoscaler operator 1.34 chores and updating its deps exposes a need for an update here. Probably we should close this in favor of #332, which somehow I missed when I opened this one.

Fingers crossed that the k/k 1.34 downstream rebase can land soon!

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Oct 7, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2025

@joelsmith: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Where has this latency affected you?

I'm doing the cluster autoscaler operator 1.34 chores and updating its deps exposes a need for an update here. Probably we should close this in favor of #332, which somehow I missed when I opened this one.

Fingers crossed that the k/k 1.34 downstream rebase can land soon!

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants