Skip to content

Fisheye camera model for calibration and stereo rectification#2889

Merged
opencv-pushbot merged 1 commit intoopencv:2.4from
Ilya-Krylov:fisheye
Jun 24, 2014
Merged

Fisheye camera model for calibration and stereo rectification#2889
opencv-pushbot merged 1 commit intoopencv:2.4from
Ilya-Krylov:fisheye

Conversation

@Ilya-Krylov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixed failing test on windows x64 and build issues on android
http://master.ocv/buildbot/builders/precommit_windows64/builds/160/steps/test_calib3d/logs/stdio

@Ilya-Krylov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@vpisarev , please review

@vpisarev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍

@opencv-pushbot opencv-pushbot merged commit 84bb77e into opencv:2.4 Jun 24, 2014
vpisarev added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2014
@SpecLad SpecLad mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2014
@rgkoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

rgkoo commented Aug 28, 2014

@Ilya-Krylov
Sorry,I don't know other efficient way to comunicate with you,so write in this place.
When I read the docs of opencv3.0,I found some functions about fisheye and fisheye model developed by you,they are great.
I want to ask you which papers you have referenced about the fisheye model.
Thanks.

@Ilya-Krylov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@rgkoo ,
Hi, functions about fisheye were ported from Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab of Jean-Yves Bouguet. You could found references there.

@rgkoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

rgkoo commented Sep 1, 2014

@Ilya-Krylov Very thank.

@ShaowuYang
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Ilya-Krylov
Hi, if the camera model in Jean-Yves Bouguet's work is used, I would assume that the model and calibration method in Opencv does not fit to fisheye lens with FOV up to 180 degrees. Is that true?
Thanks a lot.

@rfn123
Copy link
Copy Markdown

rfn123 commented Jul 10, 2017

@Ilya-Krylov Hi, first of all, thank you for your contribution of the fisheye model, I am using it now and it works very well! I now want to understand the maths behind it, and I have a question:
when you compute the angle of the incoming ray (e.g. in line 136), why did you use the normalized version double theta = atan(r); ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants