G-API: Integration branch for ONNX & Python-related changes#23597
G-API: Integration branch for ONNX & Python-related changes#23597asmorkalov merged 10 commits intoopencv:4.xfrom
Conversation
- Mean/StDev - Normalize flag
…ic infer * Some design review is required still, see new TODOs and FIXMEs
dmatveev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented on the questionable parts in rev. 0
| // Adding const input is necessary because the definition of input_names | ||
| // includes const input. | ||
| // FIXME(DM): This is actually questionable! | ||
| for (const auto& a : pp.const_inputs) | ||
| { | ||
| pp.input_names.push_back(a.first); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@TolyaTalamanov @mpashchenkov this may require your review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's weird, const inputs must be set explicitly via cfgConstInputs maybe @mpashchenkov knows details...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe it came with #22017, I am wondering what's the right approach there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed this code for now, and tests pass. Propose to keep it as-is.
- cv::gapi::combine() is now exposed as cv.gapi.combine(); - GKernelPackage::size() was exposed in Python for testing purposes; - Fluid `imgproc` kernel package was exposed as cv.gapi.imgproc.fluid.kernels().
* Removed PyObjectHolder usage * Throw understandable error message * Added tests
| const cv::Scalar &m, | ||
| const cv::Scalar &s); | ||
| GAPI_WRAP | ||
| PyParams& cfgNormalize(const std::string &layer_name, bool flag); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I propose we disable normalization at all if cfgMeanStd is provided because using these two is very confusing...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wait, shouldn't we in fact enable normalization when we pass mean/std?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Discussed locally, quick summary:
squeezenet1.0.*onnx - doesn't require scaling to [0,1] and mean/std because the weights of the first convolution already scaled. ONNX documentation is broken. So the correct approach to use this models is:
- ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44 but without normalization step:
# DON'T DO IT:
# mean_vec = np.array([0.485, 0.456, 0.406])
# stddev_vec = np.array([0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
# norm_img_data = np.zeros(img_data.shape).astype('float32')
# for i in range(img_data.shape[0]):
# norm_img_data[i,:,:] = (img_data[i,:,:]/255 - mean_vec[i]) / stddev_vec[i]
# # add batch channel
# norm_img_data = norm_img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224).astype('float32')
# return norm_img_data
# INSTEAD
return img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224)
- G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to
applyas-is with configuring parameters:
net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename)
net.cfgNormalize('data_0', False)
Note: Results might be difference because G-API doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution.
squeezenet1.1.*onnx - requires scaling to [0,1] and mean/std - onnx documentation is correct.
- ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44
- G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to
applyas-is with configuring parameters:
net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename)
net.cfgNormalize('data_0', True) // default
net.cfgMeanStd('data_0', [0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
Note: Results might be difference because G-API doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @TolyaTalamanov
It seems with the exposed knobs we cover most of the cases so can go forward in the current state
|
@TolyaTalamanov I see you fixed stateful kernels here, please update the PR description accordingly (add a new chapter please). Thanks! |
0) Fixed compilation warnings on onnx.hpp 1) Explicitly disabled normalization in C++ & Python tests which use squeezenet1.0-9.onnx 2) Aligned the Python ONNX test to take model from ONNX Zoo (rely on the same test environment used for C++ ONNX tests)
…o dm/gapi_onnx_py_integration
5f0158f to
e5b7f3a
Compare
|
@asmorkalov can you please merge this one? Thanks! |
…tion G-API: Integration branch for ONNX & Python-related changes opencv#23597 # Changes overview ## 1. Expose ONNX backend's Normalization and Mean-value parameters in Python * Since Python G-API bindings rely on `Generic` infer to express Inference, the `Generic` specialization of `onnx::Params` was extended with new methods to control normalization (`/255`) and mean-value; these methods were exposed in the Python bindings * Found some questionable parts in the existing API which I'd like to review/discuss (see comments) UPD: 1. Thanks to @TolyaTalamanov normalization inconsistencies have been identified with `squeezenet1.0-9` ONNX model itself; tests using these model were updated to DISABLE normalization and NOT using mean/value. 2. Questionable parts were removed and tests still pass. ### Details (taken from @TolyaTalamanov's comment): `squeezenet1.0.*onnx` - doesn't require scaling to [0,1] and mean/std because the weights of the first convolution already scaled. ONNX documentation is broken. So the correct approach to use this models is: 1. ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44 but without normalization step: ``` # DON'T DO IT: # mean_vec = np.array([0.485, 0.456, 0.406]) # stddev_vec = np.array([0.229, 0.224, 0.225]) # norm_img_data = np.zeros(img_data.shape).astype('float32') # for i in range(img_data.shape[0]): # norm_img_data[i,:,:] = (img_data[i,:,:]/255 - mean_vec[i]) / stddev_vec[i] # # add batch channel # norm_img_data = norm_img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224).astype('float32') # return norm_img_data # INSTEAD return img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224) ``` 2. G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to `apply` as-is with configuring parameters: ``` net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename) net.cfgNormalize('data_0', False) ``` **Note**: Results might be difference because `G-API` doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution. --- `squeezenet1.1.*onnx` - requires scaling to [0,1] and mean/std - onnx documentation is correct. 1. ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44 2. G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to `apply` as-is with configuring parameters: ``` net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename) net.cfgNormalize('data_0', True) // default net.cfgMeanStd('data_0', [0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]) ``` **Note**: Results might be difference because `G-API` doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution. ## 2. Expose Fluid & kernel package-related functionality in Python * `cv::gapi::combine()` * `cv::GKernelPackage::size()` (mainly for testing purposes) * `cv::gapi::imgproc::fluid::kernels()` Added a test for the above. ## 3. Fixed issues with Python stateful kernel handling Fixed error message when `outMeta()` of custom python operation fails. ## 4. Fixed various issues in Python tests 1. `test_gapi_streaming.py` - fixed behavior of Desync test to avoid sporadic issues 2. `test_gapi_infer_onnx.py` - fixed model lookup (it was still using the ONNX Zoo layout but was NOT using the proper env var we use to point to one). ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
…tion G-API: Integration branch for ONNX & Python-related changes opencv#23597 # Changes overview ## 1. Expose ONNX backend's Normalization and Mean-value parameters in Python * Since Python G-API bindings rely on `Generic` infer to express Inference, the `Generic` specialization of `onnx::Params` was extended with new methods to control normalization (`/255`) and mean-value; these methods were exposed in the Python bindings * Found some questionable parts in the existing API which I'd like to review/discuss (see comments) UPD: 1. Thanks to @TolyaTalamanov normalization inconsistencies have been identified with `squeezenet1.0-9` ONNX model itself; tests using these model were updated to DISABLE normalization and NOT using mean/value. 2. Questionable parts were removed and tests still pass. ### Details (taken from @TolyaTalamanov's comment): `squeezenet1.0.*onnx` - doesn't require scaling to [0,1] and mean/std because the weights of the first convolution already scaled. ONNX documentation is broken. So the correct approach to use this models is: 1. ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44 but without normalization step: ``` # DON'T DO IT: # mean_vec = np.array([0.485, 0.456, 0.406]) # stddev_vec = np.array([0.229, 0.224, 0.225]) # norm_img_data = np.zeros(img_data.shape).astype('float32') # for i in range(img_data.shape[0]): # norm_img_data[i,:,:] = (img_data[i,:,:]/255 - mean_vec[i]) / stddev_vec[i] # # add batch channel # norm_img_data = norm_img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224).astype('float32') # return norm_img_data # INSTEAD return img_data.reshape(1, 3, 224, 224) ``` 2. G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to `apply` as-is with configuring parameters: ``` net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename) net.cfgNormalize('data_0', False) ``` **Note**: Results might be difference because `G-API` doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution. --- `squeezenet1.1.*onnx` - requires scaling to [0,1] and mean/std - onnx documentation is correct. 1. ONNX: apply preprocessing from the documentation: https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/classification/imagenet_preprocess.py#L8-L44 2. G-API: Convert image from BGR to RGB and then pass to `apply` as-is with configuring parameters: ``` net = cv.gapi.onnx.params('squeezenet', model_filename) net.cfgNormalize('data_0', True) // default net.cfgMeanStd('data_0', [0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]) ``` **Note**: Results might be difference because `G-API` doesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution. ## 2. Expose Fluid & kernel package-related functionality in Python * `cv::gapi::combine()` * `cv::GKernelPackage::size()` (mainly for testing purposes) * `cv::gapi::imgproc::fluid::kernels()` Added a test for the above. ## 3. Fixed issues with Python stateful kernel handling Fixed error message when `outMeta()` of custom python operation fails. ## 4. Fixed various issues in Python tests 1. `test_gapi_streaming.py` - fixed behavior of Desync test to avoid sporadic issues 2. `test_gapi_infer_onnx.py` - fixed model lookup (it was still using the ONNX Zoo layout but was NOT using the proper env var we use to point to one). ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Changes overview
1. Expose ONNX backend's Normalization and Mean-value parameters in Python
Genericinfer to express Inference, theGenericspecialization ofonnx::Paramswas extended with new methods to control normalization (/255) and mean-value; these methods were exposed in the Python bindingsUPD:
squeezenet1.0-9ONNX model itself; tests using these model were updated to DISABLE normalization and NOT using mean/value.Details (taken from @TolyaTalamanov's comment):
squeezenet1.0.*onnx- doesn't require scaling to [0,1] and mean/std because the weights of the first convolution already scaled. ONNX documentation is broken. So the correct approach to use this models is:applyas-is with configuring parameters:Note: Results might be difference because
G-APIdoesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution.squeezenet1.1.*onnx- requires scaling to [0,1] and mean/std - onnx documentation is correct.applyas-is with configuring parameters:Note: Results might be difference because
G-APIdoesn't apply central crop but just do resize to model resolution.2. Expose Fluid & kernel package-related functionality in Python
cv::gapi::combine()cv::GKernelPackage::size()(mainly for testing purposes)cv::gapi::imgproc::fluid::kernels()Added a test for the above.
3. Fixed issues with Python stateful kernel handling
Fixed error message when
outMeta()of custom python operation fails.4. Fixed various issues in Python tests
test_gapi_streaming.py- fixed behavior of Desync test to avoid sporadic issuestest_gapi_infer_onnx.py- fixed model lookup (it was still using the ONNX Zoo layout but was NOT using the proper env var we use to point to one).Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.