Add SCMP_ACT_LOG as a valid Seccomp action#1951
Merged
crosbymichael merged 2 commits intoopencontainers:masterfrom Sep 26, 2019
Merged
Add SCMP_ACT_LOG as a valid Seccomp action#1951crosbymichael merged 2 commits intoopencontainers:masterfrom
crosbymichael merged 2 commits intoopencontainers:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
REF moby/moby#38333 |
190c60b to
1039b14
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This is failing because it requires seccomp/libseccomp-golang#29 to be merged 😢 |
673434d to
0ca09a8
Compare
Contributor
Author
😁 🎉 |
Member
|
@justincormack PTAL |
Contributor
Author
|
@justincormack do you need me to do anything else? |
Contributor
Author
|
ping @justincormack |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
ping @justincormack |
thaJeztah
requested changes
Jun 17, 2019
Member
thaJeztah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
found one unrelated change; could you also squash your commits?
Dockerfile
Outdated
|
|
||
| RUN . tests/integration/multi-arch.bash \ | ||
| && curl -o- -sSL `get_busybox` | tar xfJC - ${ROOTFS} | ||
| && curl -o- -sSL `get_busybox` | tar xfJC - ${ROOTFS} No newline at end of file |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like this inadvertently removed a newline
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have removed them and learned more about git squashing ;)
fab554d to
0c82a88
Compare
Signed-off-by: blacktop <blacktop@users.noreply.github.com>
Member
|
Thanks for squashing 👍 Perhaps you can change to your real name? (see contributing.md;
Changes themselves SGTM, but I'll try to get @justincormack and/or @crosbymichael to have a look |
Member
|
LGTM |
|
@crosbymichael @thaJeztah @justincormack is there anything else left before we can merge this? |
Member
Contributor
Author
|
@crosbymichael @thaJeztah @justincormack I have rebased so we should be good to go now? |
Member
|
Looks like there's a merge-commit in your branch; did you do a rebase, or a merge? |
Contributor
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
Member
|
LGTM |
Contributor
Author
|
We did it!!!! 👍 😎 👍 |
thaJeztah
added a commit
to thaJeztah/docker
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2019
full diff: opencontainers/runc@3e425f8...v1.0.0-rc9 - opencontainers/runc#1951 Add SCMP_ACT_LOG as a valid Seccomp action - opencontainers/runc#2130 *: verify operations on /proc/... are on procfs This is an additional mitigation for CVE-2019-16884. The primary problem is that Docker can be coerced into bind-mounting a file system on top of /proc (resulting in label-related writes to /proc no longer happening). While we are working on mitigations against permitting the mounts, this helps avoid our code from being tricked into writing to non-procfs files. This is not a perfect solution (after all, there might be a bind-mount of a different procfs file over the target) but in order to exploit that you would need to be able to tweak a config.json pretty specifically (which thankfully Docker doesn't allow). Specifically this stops AppArmor from not labeling a process silently due to /proc/self/attr/... being incorrectly set, and stops any accidental fd leaks because /proc/self/fd/... is not real. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
stefanberger
pushed a commit
to stefanberger/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2019
Signed-off-by: blacktop <blacktop@users.noreply.github.com>
docker-jenkins
pushed a commit
to docker-archive/docker-ce
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2020
full diff: opencontainers/runc@3e425f8...v1.0.0-rc9 - opencontainers/runc#1951 Add SCMP_ACT_LOG as a valid Seccomp action - opencontainers/runc#2130 *: verify operations on /proc/... are on procfs This is an additional mitigation for CVE-2019-16884. The primary problem is that Docker can be coerced into bind-mounting a file system on top of /proc (resulting in label-related writes to /proc no longer happening). While we are working on mitigations against permitting the mounts, this helps avoid our code from being tricked into writing to non-procfs files. This is not a perfect solution (after all, there might be a bind-mount of a different procfs file over the target) but in order to exploit that you would need to be able to tweak a config.json pretty specifically (which thankfully Docker doesn't allow). Specifically this stops AppArmor from not labeling a process silently due to /proc/self/attr/... being incorrectly set, and stops any accidental fd leaks because /proc/self/fd/... is not real. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl> Upstream-commit: efcd84e47c6bc3f5e52eb2cce518f55501d60ce7 Component: engine
adrianreber
pushed a commit
to adrianreber/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2020
Signed-off-by: blacktop <blacktop@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This enables logging of all system calls in a container. This could be useful for creating minimal seccomp profiles, and is the only Seccomp action runc doesn't support at present.