fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config by clawsweeper[bot] · Pull Request #86726 · openclaw/openclaw

clawsweeper · 2026-05-26T02:28:41Z

Makes #86700 merge-ready for the ClawSweeper automerge loop.
The edit pass should inspect the live PR diff, review comments, and failing checks; rebase if needed; keep the contributor branch credited; and stop only when validation is green or an external blocker is proven.

ClawSweeper 🐠 replacement reef notes:

Cluster: automerge-openclaw-openclaw-86700
Source PRs: fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config #86700
Credit: Source PR: fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config #86700
Validation: pnpm check:changed
Replacement reason: ClawSweeper could not update the source PR branch directly, so it opened a writable replacement PR instead.
Automerge requested by: @Takhoffman

Repair fallback: GitHub rejected the repair branch push because it updates workflow files and the ClawSweeper app token does not have workflows permission

Co-author credit kept:

@BlackFrameAI: Co-authored-by: Blackframe AI 122847831+BlackFrameAI@users.noreply.github.com

fish notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against befbe16.

clawsweeper · 2026-05-26T02:31:52Z

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed May 25, 2026, 10:46 PM ET / 02:46 UTC.

Summary
Review failed before ClawSweeper could summarize the requested change.

PR surface: Source +11, Tests +72. Total +83 across 3 files.

Reproducibility: unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Review metrics: none identified.

Merge readiness
Overall: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Proof: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Patch quality: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Result: rating does not apply to this item.

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch.

Risk before merge

No close action taken because the review did not complete.

Maintainer options:

Decide the mitigation before merge
Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.
Pause or close
Do not merge this PR until maintainers decide whether the risk is worth taking.

Next step before merge
Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made.

Review details

Best possible solution:

Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Unclear. Retry the review first so ClawSweeper can evaluate the actual issue and fix direction.

AGENTS.md: unclear because the file could not be read completely.

Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 609d70d35e4f.

Label changes

Label changes:

add rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.
remove proof: sufficient: Current real behavior proof status is not_applicable, not sufficient.
remove P2: Current review triage priority is none.
remove rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Current PR rating is rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool, so this older rating label is no longer current.
remove merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility: Current PR review selected no merge-risk labels.
remove merge-risk: 🚨 security-boundary: Current PR review selected no merge-risk labels.

Label justifications:

rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.
status: 🚀 automerge armed: This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane. Not applicable: Real behavior proof was not assessed because the Codex review failed.

Evidence reviewed

PR surface:

Source +11, Tests +72. Total +83 across 3 files.

View PR surface stats

Area	Files	Added	Removed	Net
Source	2	20	9	+11
Tests	1	74	2	+72
Docs	0	0	0	0
Config	0	0	0	0
Generated	0	0	0	0
Other	0	0	0	0
Total	3	94	11	+83

What I checked:

failure reason: timeout.
codex failure detail: Codex review failed for this PR: spawnSync codex ETIMEDOUT.
codex stdout: Per-item Codex failure; continuing with the rest of the shard.

Likely related people:

unknown: Codex failed before it could trace repository history. (role: review did not complete; confidence: low)

What the crustacean ranks mean

🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

How this review workflow works

ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

clawsweeper · 2026-05-26T02:50:15Z

ClawSweeper PR egg

✨ Hatched: 🥚 common Frosted Proofling

Hatch command

Comment @clawsweeper hatch when this PR is hatchable.

Hatchability rules:

Merged PRs are hatchable.
Open PRs are hatchable when they are status: 👀 ready for maintainer look, status: 🚀 automerge armed, or labeled clawsweeper:automerge.
Closed unmerged PRs are hatchable only when one of those hatchable labels is still present in the durable record.

Rarity: 🥚 common.
Trait: stacks clean commits.
Image traits: location green-check meadow; accessory miniature diff map; palette plum, gold, and soft gray; mood bright-eyed; pose nestled inside a glowing shell; shell woven fiber shell; lighting tiny status-light glow; background delicate sparkle particles.
Share on X: post this hatch
Copy: My PR egg hatched a 🥚 common Frosted Proofling in ClawSweeper.

What is this egg doing here?

Eggs appear after the PR passes real-behavior proof. It is here for vibes, not verdicts: it does not change labels, ratings, merge decisions, or automation.
The shell reacts to review momentum: open follow-up work warms it up, re-review makes it wobble, and a clean final review lets it hatch.
Hatchability usually comes from sufficient real-behavior proof, no blocking P0/P1/P2 findings, no security attention needed, and clean correctness. A merged PR is already final, so merge makes the egg hatchable independently.
The hatch is seeded from this repository and PR number, so the same PR keeps the same creature; the reviewed head SHA can only change safe visual details.
Rarity is just collectible sparkle: 🥚 common, 🌱 uncommon, 💎 rare, ✨ glimmer, and 🌈 legendary.

clawsweeper · 2026-05-26T02:50:21Z

🦞✅
ClawSweeper is pausing this repair loop for human review.

Source: clawsweeper[bot]
Reason: Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made. (sha=befbe163626b9cf69a840ffb09c86d1828d4e915)

Why human review is needed:
ClawSweeper found a blocker that should be resolved or accepted by a maintainer before the repair or automerge loop continues.

What the maintainer can do as a next step:
If the maintainer accepts the current risk and wants ClawSweeper to continue merge gates, comment @clawsweeper approve. If more work is needed, resolve the blocker first, then comment @clawsweeper automerge to re-review and continue. If automation should stay paused, leave clawsweeper:human-review in place or comment @clawsweeper stop.

I added clawsweeper:human-review and left the final call with a maintainer.

Takhoffman · 2026-05-26T02:57:45Z

@clawsweeper approve

clawsweeper · 2026-05-26T02:57:47Z

🦞✅
Maintainer-approved ClawSweeper automerge is complete.

Approver: Takhoffman
Head: befbe163626b
Merge status: merged by ClawSweeper automerge
Merged at: 2026-05-26T02:58:21Z
Merge commit: c9d0464ed116

What merged:

Merged fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config after ClawSweeper review.

Automerge notes:

PR branch already contained follow-up commit before automerge: fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config

The automerge loop is complete.

Automerge progress:

2026-05-26 02:58:23 UTC merged befbe163626b (merged by ClawSweeper automerge)

Summary: - Merged fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config after ClawSweeper review. Automerge notes: - PR branch already contained follow-up commit before automerge: fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config Validation: - ClawSweeper review passed for head befbe16. - Required merge gates passed before the squash merge. Prepared head SHA: befbe16 Review: openclaw#86726 (comment) Co-authored-by: BlackFrameAI <122847831+BlackFrameAI@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: clawsweeper <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Approved-by: takhoffman Co-authored-by: takhoffman <781889+takhoffman@users.noreply.github.com>

BlackFrameAI and others added 2 commits May 26, 2026 02:28

fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config

24eba3a

fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config

befbe16

clawsweeper Bot added app: web-ui App: web-ui size: XS clawsweeper:automerge Maintainer opted this PR into bounded ClawSweeper-reviewed automerge proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. labels May 26, 2026

openclaw-barnacle Bot removed the size: XS label May 26, 2026

clawsweeper Bot added the proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. label May 26, 2026

openclaw-barnacle Bot added the size: S label May 26, 2026

clawsweeper Bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2026

fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config #86700

Closed

openclaw-barnacle Bot removed the proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. label May 26, 2026

clawsweeper Bot added the clawsweeper:human-review Needs maintainer review before ClawSweeper can continue label May 26, 2026

clawsweeper Bot removed the clawsweeper:human-review Needs maintainer review before ClawSweeper can continue label May 26, 2026

clawsweeper Bot merged commit c9d0464 into main May 26, 2026
181 of 201 checks passed

clawsweeper Bot deleted the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-86700 branch May 26, 2026 02:58

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2026

📡 Upstream Digest — 2026-05-26 07:37 UTC curtismercier/openclaw-mods#949

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config#86726

fix(control-ui): support raw edits from editable config#86726
clawsweeper[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-86700

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Takhoffman commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Hatch command

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Takhoffman commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading