• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

• 🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
• 🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
• 🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
• 🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
• 🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
• 🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
• 🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Best possible solution:

Land the source-keyed dispatch operation approach after maintainers confirm the exact head has green CI and enough Discord/ACP stop proof for source-vs-target ownership and late-reply suppression.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Yes. The linked issue includes live Discord stuck-session logs, and current-main source inspection shows dispatch work reaches hooks/resolver without a dispatch-owned reply operation that /stop or recovery can abort before the embedded run is active.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes, with maintainer validation. Registering one reply operation before hook/model dispatch and threading it into runPreparedReply, ACP tail dispatch, and /stop is the narrow maintainable fix for the missing abort owner; the main remaining question is live transport proof on the final head.

Label changes:

• add P1: The linked bug wedges Discord/ACP sessions and blocks /stop/recovery for real channel workflows, matching urgent session/message delivery impact.
• add merge-risk: 🚨 message-delivery: The PR changes when late hook/resolver callbacks and final deliveries are suppressed after abort, which can affect whether users see or lose replies.
• add merge-risk: 🚨 session-state: The PR changes active reply-operation ownership, session IDs, queue cleanup, and bound ACP source-vs-target lane handling.
• add proof: sufficient: Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. The PR body includes structured real-behavior proof for prior Discord live QA and ACP live bind/stop scenarios on the branch, plus focused post-patch local abort tests; it also discloses the missing fresh AWS Crabbox rerun.
• add rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Current PR rating is 🐚 platinum hermit because proof is 🐚 platinum hermit, patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit, and The patch is broad but coherent, has targeted regression coverage, and includes usable real-behavior proof with an acknowledged final transport-proof gap.
• add status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Sufficient (live_output): The PR body includes structured real-behavior proof for prior Discord live QA and ACP live bind/stop scenarios on the branch, plus focused post-patch local abort tests; it also discloses the missing fresh AWS Crabbox rerun.

Label justifications:

• P1: The linked bug wedges Discord/ACP sessions and blocks /stop/recovery for real channel workflows, matching urgent session/message delivery impact.
• merge-risk: 🚨 message-delivery: The PR changes when late hook/resolver callbacks and final deliveries are suppressed after abort, which can affect whether users see or lose replies.
• merge-risk: 🚨 session-state: The PR changes active reply-operation ownership, session IDs, queue cleanup, and bound ACP source-vs-target lane handling.
• rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Current PR rating is 🐚 platinum hermit because proof is 🐚 platinum hermit, patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit, and The patch is broad but coherent, has targeted regression coverage, and includes usable real-behavior proof with an acknowledged final transport-proof gap.
• status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Sufficient (live_output): The PR body includes structured real-behavior proof for prior Discord live QA and ACP live bind/stop scenarios on the branch, plus focused post-patch local abort tests; it also discloses the missing fresh AWS Crabbox rerun.
• proof: sufficient: Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. The PR body includes structured real-behavior proof for prior Discord live QA and ACP live bind/stop scenarios on the branch, plus focused post-patch local abort tests; it also discloses the missing fresh AWS Crabbox rerun.

What I checked:

• Protected label: The provided GitHub context lists the PR with the protected maintainer label, so conservative cleanup must keep it open for explicit maintainer handling.
• Patch scope: The PR commit adds the abort ownership implementation and focused regression coverage across dispatch, abort handling, get-reply-run, stuck-session recovery, and changelog files. (af1dd6e49985)
• Dispatch operation registration: The PR version creates a source/target-aware dispatch reply operation and abort-aware dispatcher before before_dispatch, reply_dispatch, and resolver work can run. (src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts:856, 0e56380838c7)
• Late delivery suppression: The PR version wraps hook dispatchers and resolver callbacks with abort checks so late tool, block, and final replies do not enqueue after the operation aborts. (src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts:917, 0e56380838c7)
• Bound ACP stop handling: The abort path now resolves bound ACP targets, aborts both target and source lanes when appropriate, and avoids persisting source-conversation cutoff metadata onto unrelated ACP target sessions. (src/auto-reply/reply/abort.ts:339, 0e56380838c7)
• Regression coverage: The new tests cover prompt abort, tail dispatch abort, late hook/resolver suppression, native command source-vs-target ownership, and pre-run stuck-session recovery cleanup. (src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.acp-abort.test.ts:404, 0e56380838c7)

Likely related people:

• Sally O'Malley: Current-main blame for the central dispatch, abort, and reply-run registry lines resolves mostly to the grafted current-main commit that carries these auto-reply paths in this checkout. (role: introduced current-main behavior; confidence: medium; commits: e72f60192571; files: src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts, src/auto-reply/reply/abort.ts, src/auto-reply/reply/reply-run-registry.ts)
• clawsweeper[bot]: Recent current-main work changed dispatch diagnostics in the same dispatch-from-config path that this PR extends. (role: recent area contributor; confidence: medium; commits: 5955f354f74d; files: src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts)
• steipete: The bounded history search for tryFastAbortFromMessage shows prior abort-related fixes and test isolation work by Peter Steinberger in this area. (role: prior abort-path contributor; confidence: medium; commits: 5898304fa049, 9924627f49ca, e510042870cf; files: src/auto-reply/reply/abort.ts, src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts)
• vincentkoc: The bounded history search shows prior inbound dispatch startup and seam-extraction work touching the same auto-reply dispatch surface. (role: adjacent area contributor; confidence: medium; commits: 5369ea53bee3, 7308e72fac98; files: src/auto-reply/reply/abort.ts, src/auto-reply/reply/dispatch-from-config.ts)

Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 26e64bda1485.

• Eggs appear after the PR passes real-behavior proof. It is here for vibes, not verdicts: it does not change labels, ratings, merge decisions, or automation.
• The shell reacts to review momentum: open follow-up work warms it up, re-review makes it wobble, and a clean final review lets it hatch.
• Hatchability usually comes from sufficient real-behavior proof, no blocking P0/P1/P2 findings, no security attention needed, and clean correctness. A merged PR is already final, so merge makes the egg hatchable independently.
• The hatch is seeded from this repository and PR number, so the same PR keeps the same creature; the reviewed head SHA can only change safe visual details.
• Rarity is just collectible sparkle: 🥚 common, 🌱 uncommon, 💎 rare, ✨ glimmer, and 🌈 legendary.