[codex] DNS: exercise codex-core CI failure#25905
Closed
anp-oai wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
just testing, confirmed that CI is not catching failures after bazel refactor |
anp-oai
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
## Why PR #25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by #25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. ## What changed Revert #25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. ## Validation Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
dkropachev
pushed a commit
to dkropachev/codex
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2026
PR openai#25905 intentionally adds a failing `codex-core` unit test, but its [Bazel test on Windows check](https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/26837526950/job/79135369259) passed. That shows the Bazel configuration introduced by openai#25156 is not behaving as expected, so revert it while the configuration can be investigated separately. Revert openai#25156 in full, restoring the previous Bazel remote configuration, CI scripts, workflows, `rusty_v8` handling, and documentation. This removes the shared BuildBuddy wrapper and its tests. Not run locally; this exact revert was prioritized for a fast rollback.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DO NOT SUBMIT. This draft PR exists only to verify CI failure reporting for
codex-core.It adds a clearly named, intentionally failing
codex-coreunit test and updates a test-only rolloutprintln!label.The local
codex-coretest run was interrupted before completion at the user's request. CI is expected to fail atutil::tests::ci_test_intentionally_fails.