You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note to first-time contributors: Please open a discussion post in Discussions to discuss your idea/fix with the community before creating a pull request, and describe your changes before submitting a pull request.
This is to ensure large feature PRs are discussed with the community first, before starting work on it. If the community does not want this feature or it is not relevant for Open WebUI as a project, it can be identified in the discussion before working on the feature and submitting the PR.
Before submitting, make sure you've checked the following:
Target branch: Verify that the pull request targets the dev branch. PRs targeting main will be immediately closed.
Description: Provide a concise description of the changes made in this pull request down below.
Changelog: Ensure a changelog entry following the format of Keep a Changelog is added at the bottom of the PR description.
Documentation: Add docs in Open WebUI Docs Repository. Document user-facing behavior, environment variables, public APIs/interfaces, or deployment steps.
Dependencies: Are there any new or upgraded dependencies? If so, explain why, update the changelog/docs, and include any compatibility notes. Actually run the code/function that uses updated library to ensure it doesn't crash.
Testing: Perform manual tests to verify the implemented fix/feature works as intended AND does not break any other functionality. Include reproducible steps to demonstrate the issue before the fix. Test edge cases (URL encoding, HTML entities, types). Take this as an opportunity to make screenshots of the feature/fix and include them in the PR description.
Agentic AI Code: Confirm this Pull Request is not written by any AI Agent or has at least gone through additional human review AND manual testing. If any AI Agent is the co-author of this PR, it may lead to immediate closure of the PR.
Code review: Have you performed a self-review of your code, addressing any coding standard issues and ensuring adherence to the project's coding standards?
Design & Architecture: Prefer smart defaults over adding new settings; use local state for ephemeral UI logic. Open a Discussion for major architectural or UX changes.
Git Hygiene: Keep PRs atomic (one logical change). Clean up commits and rebase on dev to ensure no unrelated commits (e.g. from main) are included. Push updates to the existing PR branch instead of closing and reopening.
Title Prefix: To clearly categorize this pull request, prefix the pull request title using one of the following:
BREAKING CHANGE: Significant changes that may affect compatibility
build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
ci: Changes to our continuous integration processes or workflows
chore: Refactor, cleanup, or other non-functional code changes
docs: Documentation update or addition
feat: Introduces a new feature or enhancement to the codebase
fix: Bug fix or error correction
i18n: Internationalization or localization changes
perf: Performance improvement
refactor: Code restructuring for better maintainability, readability, or scalability
style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)
test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
WIP: Work in progress, a temporary label for incomplete or ongoing work
Changelog Entry
Description
getContents() traverses the message tree and regex-scans all assistant content for code/HTML/CSS/JS blocks on every streaming token via $: if (history). On fast models this means dozens of scans per frame with no visual benefit, since the browser only renders at ~60fps. The fix wraps the call in requestAnimationFrame, matching the existing scrollRAF pattern in this file and pendingRebuild in Messages.svelte. The artifact preview continues to update in real time.
Added
[List any new features, functionalities, or additions]
Changed
Chat.svelte: debounce getContents() with requestAnimationFrame
Deprecated
[List any deprecated functionality or features that have been removed]
Removed
[List any removed features, files, or functionalities]
Fixed
[List any fixes, corrections, or bug fixes]
Security
[List any new or updated security-related changes, including vulnerability fixes]
Breaking Changes
BREAKING CHANGE: [List any breaking changes affecting compatibility or functionality]
Additional Information
[Insert any additional context, notes, or explanations for the changes]
[Reference any related issues, commits, or other relevant information]
Screenshots or Videos
[Attach any relevant screenshots or videos demonstrating the changes]
Contributor License Agreement
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that I have read and fully agree to the Contributor License Agreement (CLA), and I am providing my contributions under its terms.
Note
Deleting the CLA section will lead to immediate closure of your PR and it will not be merged in.
We appreciate you taking the time to submit a pull request to Open WebUI!
⚠️ Important: Testing Requirements
We've recently seen an increase in PRs that have significant issues:
PRs that don't actually fix the bug they claim to fix
PRs that don't implement the feature they describe
PRs that break existing functionality
PRs that are clearly AI-generated without proper testing being done by the author
PRs that simply don't work as intended
These untested PRs consume significant time from maintainers and volunteer contributors who review and test PRs in their free time.
Time that could be spent testing other PRs or improving Open WebUI in other ways.
Before marking your PR as "Ready for Review":
Please explicitly confirm:
✅ You have personally tested ALL changes in this PR
✅ How you tested it (specific steps you took to verify it works)
✅ Visual evidence where applicable (screenshots or videos showing the feature/fix working) - if applicable to your specific PR
If you're not certain your PR works exactly as intended, please leave it in DRAFT mode until you've thoroughly tested it.
Thank you for helping us maintain quality and respecting the time of our community! 🙏
⚠️ Warning: Possible Non-Atomic / Scope Creep PR Detected
Your PR was subjected to automated review by AI to determine if it could fall under Open WebUI's non-atomicity ruleset or scope creep.
This PR appears to contain multiple unrelated changes that could be split into separate pull requests.
🔍 AI Analysis Summary
Primary Intent: Performance optimization: debounce getContents() calls using requestAnimationFrame to prevent excessive re-renders when history changes rapidly
Secondary Changes Detected:
None identified
📝 Detailed Analysis and Full Report (click to expand)
This diff makes a pure performance optimization to existing code in Chat.svelte. The change adds requestAnimationFrame-based debouncing to the reactive statement that calls getContents() when history changes. This is a classic example of a 'Pre-factor' optimization that could have been merged as a separate PR BEFORE or AFTER any feature work. The optimization is completely independent of any feature - it's merely improving the performance of an already-existing reactive behavior. According to the rejection criteria: 'Bundled Perf: Implementing a feature AND optimizing performance (unless the feature IS the optimization)' - this is NOT the feature being built, it's optimization of existing code. This should have been a separate PR.
Why Atomic PRs With Narrow Scopes Matter
Atomic PRs (single-purpose PRs) are:
Easier to review - Reviewers can focus on one thing at a time
Easier to test - Each change can be verified independently
Easier to revert - If something breaks, we can revert just the problematic change
Faster to merge - Smaller, focused PRs get reviewed and merged quicker
What Makes a PR Atomic / Narrow in Scope?
An atomic PR should contain one semantic change:
✅ Just one bug fix (even if it touches multiple files)
✅ Just one feature (even if it requires changes across multiple files)
✅ Just i18n/translation updates
✅ Just documentation updates
✅ Just refactoring of one specific thing
✅ Just one performance improvement
What To Do
This is an automated analysis. If you believe this assessment is incorrect and your PR is actually atomic (all changes serve one unified purpose), please explain in a comment below.
Consider splitting this PR into separate, focused pull requests. Each PR should address one specific thing.
For example, if you have a bug fix and a new feature, submit them as two separate PRs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Checklist
Note to first-time contributors: Please open a discussion post in Discussions to discuss your idea/fix with the community before creating a pull request, and describe your changes before submitting a pull request.
This is to ensure large feature PRs are discussed with the community first, before starting work on it. If the community does not want this feature or it is not relevant for Open WebUI as a project, it can be identified in the discussion before working on the feature and submitting the PR.
Before submitting, make sure you've checked the following:
devbranch. PRs targetingmainwill be immediately closed.devto ensure no unrelated commits (e.g. frommain) are included. Push updates to the existing PR branch instead of closing and reopening.Changelog Entry
Description
getContents()traverses the message tree and regex-scans all assistant content for code/HTML/CSS/JS blocks on every streaming token via$: if (history). On fast models this means dozens of scans per frame with no visual benefit, since the browser only renders at ~60fps. The fix wraps the call inrequestAnimationFrame, matching the existingscrollRAFpattern in this file andpendingRebuildinMessages.svelte. The artifact preview continues to update in real time.Added
Changed
Chat.svelte: debouncegetContents()withrequestAnimationFrameDeprecated
Removed
Fixed
Security
Breaking Changes
Additional Information
Screenshots or Videos
Contributor License Agreement
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that I have read and fully agree to the Contributor License Agreement (CLA), and I am providing my contributions under its terms.
Note
Deleting the CLA section will lead to immediate closure of your PR and it will not be merged in.