Skip to content

build: decouple integration tests from the rest of the codebase#1792

Merged
toddbaert merged 3 commits into
open-feature:mainfrom
open-feature-forking:build/make_integration_test_independent_from_code_here
Sep 4, 2025
Merged

build: decouple integration tests from the rest of the codebase#1792
toddbaert merged 3 commits into
open-feature:mainfrom
open-feature-forking:build/make_integration_test_independent_from_code_here

Conversation

@aepfli

@aepfli aepfli commented Sep 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
@aepfli aepfli requested review from a team as code owners September 4, 2025 06:41
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for polite-licorice-3db33c canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 53a6387
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/polite-licorice-3db33c/deploys/68b9506394a0c80008b79e6e

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 4, 2025

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @aepfli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the project's build process by creating a clearer separation between the core application code and its integration tests. The primary goal is to enhance build efficiency and modularity by preventing integration test modules from being processed alongside the main codebase during standard build operations.

Highlights

  • Build Process Decoupling: The build system has been updated to decouple integration tests from the main codebase. This is achieved by modifying the Makefile to exclude directories containing integration tests from the ALL_GO_MOD_DIRS variable, ensuring that these modules are not included in general Go module operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request decouples the integration tests from the rest of the codebase by excluding the test/integration directory from the ALL_GO_MOD_DIRS variable in the Makefile. The change is functionally correct, but I've suggested a more robust way to exclude the directory to prevent potential issues in the future.

Comment thread Makefile Outdated
Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
Comment thread .github/workflows/build.yaml Outdated
@toddbaert toddbaert self-requested a review September 4, 2025 07:37
Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
@aepfli aepfli force-pushed the build/make_integration_test_independent_from_code_here branch from de52022 to 53a6387 Compare September 4, 2025 08:40
@aepfli aepfli requested review from a team September 4, 2025 08:42
@aepfli

aepfli commented Sep 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/gemini review

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request successfully decouples the integration tests into their own Go module. This is a good architectural improvement that will help with dependency management and build isolation. The change in the Makefile to exclude the new test/integration module from the main Go workspace is correct.

I have one suggestion regarding the Makefile. By excluding the integration test module from the ALL_GO_MOD_DIRS variable, the linting process will skip this new module. I've added a comment with a suggestion to add a separate linting step for the integration tests to ensure code quality is maintained across the entire codebase.

Comment thread Makefile
@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 59c2ff1 into open-feature:main Sep 4, 2025
15 checks passed
@aepfli aepfli deleted the build/make_integration_test_independent_from_code_here branch September 4, 2025 13:13
toddbaert pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
depends: #1792 for fixing build issues

---------

Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
thisthat pushed a commit to thisthat/flagd that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
…-feature#1792)

Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Liva <giovanni.liva@dynatrace.com>
thisthat pushed a commit to thisthat/flagd that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
depends: open-feature#1792 for fixing build issues

---------

Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Liva <giovanni.liva@dynatrace.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants