add missings since 4.03.0 tags in stdlib.#593
Merged
gasche merged 1 commit intoocaml:4.03from May 24, 2016
Merged
Conversation
Member
EduardoRFS
pushed a commit
to esy-ocaml/ocaml
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2021
stedolan
pushed a commit
to stedolan/ocaml
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2022
* Table_by_int_id.Id: shift inputs instead of ignoring low bits * Table_by_int_id.add: more efficient increment
EmileTrotignon
pushed a commit
to EmileTrotignon/ocaml
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Cuihtlauac ALVARADO <cuihtmlauac@tarides.com> Co-authored-by: Christine Rose <christinerose@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the functions added with 4.03 in the stlib was not tagged as it.
Sometimes tags are of the form MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH and sometimes MAJOR.MINOR, should it be standardized ?
(This PR is the same as #584 but with updated target.)