Skip to content

Conversation

@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor

@iiio2 iiio2 commented Nov 14, 2025

Here, Hybrid Rendering => R is capitalized
Edge-Side Rendering => R is capitalized
That is why I think maybe it is better R is also capitalized for SSR.

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from danielroe as a code owner November 14, 2025 12:14
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request makes minor editorial updates to README.md: feature-list descriptors were converted to sentence case (e.g., "Server-side rendering, static site generation, hybrid rendering and edge-side rendering"), "SEO Optimization and Meta tags definition" was changed to "Search engine optimization and defining meta tags", and "Go fullstack with our server/ directory" was changed to "Go full-stack with our server/ directory". A small Table of Contents formatting tweak to the "Contribute" line was also applied with no semantic change.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Documentation-only, small-scale textual edits
  • Single-file change (README.md) with consistent pattern
  • No code or behaviour to verify

Files/areas to check:

  • README.md (features list and Table of Contents "Contribute" line)

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: text consistency' accurately reflects the main change in the pull request, which involves making text formatting and capitalisation consistent throughout the documentation.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the specific consistency issue with capitalisation of 'Rendering' across different rendering method terms in the documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05a5fef and 034d1e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you ❤️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6912bf8 and 05a5fef.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Tofandel
Repo: nuxt/nuxt PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-11T12:34:22.648Z
Learning: Ensure that AI-generated summaries accurately reflect the key changes in the PR, focusing on notable changes such as the removal of unused imports and variables starting with underscores.
📚 Learning: 2024-11-11T12:34:22.648Z
Learnt from: Tofandel
Repo: nuxt/nuxt PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-11T12:34:22.648Z
Learning: Ensure that AI-generated summaries accurately reflect the key changes in the PR, focusing on notable changes such as the removal of unused imports and variables starting with underscores.

Applied to files:

  • README.md
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant (‘O’ stands for ‘optimization’). Use simply “SEO”.
Context: ... - Data fetching and state management - SEO optimization and meta tags definition - Auto imports...

(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: code
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)

17-17: Feature list sentence-casing is consistent.

The conversion to lowercase descriptors ("server-side rendering, static site generation, hybrid rendering and edge-side rendering") follows a uniform sentence-case style across the feature list.


23-23: Hyphenation of "full-stack" improves readability.

Correctly hyphenated compound adjective improves clarity and follows standard style conventions.


34-34: Table of Contents formatting is appropriate.

The minor formatting adjustment maintains visual consistency with other TOC entries.


1-39: Verify PR objectives accuracy.

The PR objectives state: "The author suggests capitalizing the 'R' in 'SSR' (Server-Side Rendering) for consistency." However, the actual changes show the opposite—converting to lowercase "rendering" across line 17. Please clarify whether the PR objectives accurately reflect the intended changes, as there appears to be a discrepancy between the stated goal and the implementation.

@danielroe danielroe merged commit a202338 into nuxt:main Nov 14, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2025
@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor Author

iiio2 commented Nov 14, 2025

Thanks @danielroe .

@iiio2 iiio2 deleted the docs/text-consistency branch November 14, 2025 17:13
danielroe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants