Skip to content

Conversation

@huang-julien
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

📚 Description

i'm starting to do some cleanup amongs todo comment.

This one is solved long ago ?

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Walkthrough

A single file (packages/kit/src/context.ts) was modified to remove a TODO comment referencing use/tryUse from unctx. There are no code, logic, API, or behavioural changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “chore(kit): remove todo comment as resolved” accurately and concisely describes the removal of a resolved TODO comment in the kit package using a conventional commit format, directly reflecting the primary change in the pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed The description clearly states that the PR removes a TODO comment as part of a cleanup effort and directly relates to the actual change in the code, even though it lacks detailed context.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/todo_unctx

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6df732 and 4737720.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/kit/src/context.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/kit/src/context.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@33389

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@33389

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@33389

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@33389

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@33389

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@33389

commit: 4737720

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 3, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #33389 will not alter performance

Comparing chore/todo_unctx (4737720) with main (d6df732)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched

@danielroe danielroe merged commit 766806c into main Oct 3, 2025
46 of 48 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the chore/todo_unctx branch October 3, 2025 21:36
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants