@bashtage or @rkern the changes look good. Could you make a quick call with respect to only modifying the new API and whether this should have a release note?

Change is safe. Whether it requires a release not only matters if you think the ls bit in a 32 bit float is worth one. Probably best to be safe.

I added a release note about the change.

Here's a script that demonstrates the changes in the variates that can occur, and shows why a release note is warranted.

import numpy as np


print(f"numpy version {np.__version__}")
print()

seed = 98765432109
print(f"seed: {seed}")
print()

print("rng.random")
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
x = rng.random(12, dtype=np.float32)
print("first 12 samples:")
print(x)
print()

n = 500_000_000

print("rng.standard_exponential")
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
x = rng.standard_exponential(size=n, dtype=np.float32)
x1 = x[-1]
x = rng.standard_exponential(size=n, dtype=np.float32)
x2 = x[-1]
print(f"last sample of {n:10d}:", x1)
print(f"last sample of {2*n:10d}:", x2)

print()

k = 2.5
print(f"rng.standard_gamma, k={k}")
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
x = rng.standard_gamma(2.5, size=n, dtype=np.float32)
print("first 14 samples:")
print(x[:14])
print(f"last sample of {n}:", x[-1])

The output for the current main development branch:

numpy version 1.22.0.dev0+1733.g8dbd507fb

seed: 98765432109

rng.random
first 12 samples:
[0.754159   0.72002673 0.00234556 0.49236786 0.16807711 0.845093
 0.06266415 0.48290312 0.80823255 0.9720112  0.01573467 0.9534826 ]

rng.standard_exponential
last sample of  500000000: 0.3884329
last sample of 1000000000: 2.664465

rng.standard_gamma, k=2.5
first 14 samples:
[2.9261618 2.168996  2.3661127 2.06449   4.889103  2.145251  2.651206
 2.109355  1.3617952 2.1510322 1.2934842 0.8435856 5.8445168 2.0458326]
last sample of 500000000: 0.46255943

The output for this pull request:

numpy version 1.22.0.dev0+1688.ge5af24d51

seed: 98765432109

rng.random
first 12 samples:
[0.754159   0.7200268  0.00234556 0.49236786 0.16807711 0.845093
 0.06266421 0.48290312 0.80823255 0.97201127 0.01573473 0.9534826 ]

rng.standard_exponential
last sample of  500000000: 0.3884329
last sample of 1000000000: 0.71304655

rng.standard_gamma, k=2.5
first 14 samples:
[2.9261618 2.168996  2.3661127 2.06449   4.889103  2.145251  2.651206
 2.109355  1.3617952 2.1510322 1.2934842 0.8435856 5.8445168 2.0458326]
last sample of 500000000: 4.6183786

You can see the small variation in the ULP of the output of rng.random.

The outputs for rng.standard_exponential and rng.standard_gamma show no differences at first, but eventually, the difference in the ULP of the values generated by next_float cause a different branch to be taken in their iterative algorithms, resulting in large changes in the stream of variates.

Thanks @WarrenWeckesser! As far as I see, this only affects the new API, since this is dtype=np.float32 and the old API does not support for this all functions. So there are no stream-compat concerns.

However, since the streams do change I am removing the backport candidate label. Please just re-add if you disagree!

This seems to be nearly an enhancement, even though is also a bug. While the intent was clearly to provide the maximum number of random bits, the nature of the bug only resulted in slightly less random values in most plausible scenarios.