Merged
Conversation
6451c9a to
e84eb25
Compare
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
5f18533 to
3131744
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #534 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 63.55% 63.12% -0.43%
==========================================
Files 25 28 +3
Lines 2763 3081 +318
==========================================
+ Hits 1756 1945 +189
- Misses 1001 1130 +129
Partials 6 6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
3131744 to
d1e5dbd
Compare
d1e5dbd to
bbd8249
Compare
bbd8249 to
d93274d
Compare
d93274d to
c42e6e2
Compare
Member
roman-khimov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Really neat. Compatible serialization/deserialization is cool. NEF has grown substantially, but it gives a lot of potential for other use cases as well.
Merged
roman-khimov
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
Closed
carpawell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
It is required for v0.25.2 hotfix release.
carpawell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
It is required for v0.25.2 hotfix release. Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Brings nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Brings nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. If new method is missing, SN falls back to old methods. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Will become available with nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534 upgrade. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Within nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#449, there is a need to store containers as VM structs. Since nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534, struct items are stored for new containers. This also needs to be done for containers created before the upgrade. Since doing this in a contract update transaction turned out to be too GAS-intensive, this implements structuring through the IR background process. Specialized method is called iteratively doing the same thing, but for several containers at a time. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2025
Brings nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
cthulhu-rider
added a commit
to nspcc-dev/neofs-node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2025
This will make it easier to support nspcc-dev/neofs-contract#534. Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
further plan: