interop: use currently executing contract state for permissions check#3473
Merged
roman-khimov merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Jun 11, 2024
Merged
interop: use currently executing contract state for permissions check#3473roman-khimov merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
roman-khimov merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.12% 86.15% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 331 331
Lines 38484 38480 -4
==========================================
+ Hits 33145 33153 +8
+ Misses 3809 3801 -8
+ Partials 1530 1526 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
AnnaShaleva
added a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2024
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change likely does not affect the mainnet's state since it's hard to meet the trigger criteria, thus we suggest not to use a hardfok. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem fix in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
AnnaShaleva
added a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2024
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change likely does not affect the mainnet's state since it's hard to meet the trigger criteria, thus we suggest not to use a hardfok. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem fix in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
11 tasks
AnnaShaleva
added a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change likely does not affect the mainnet's state since it's hard to meet the trigger criteria, thus we suggest not to use a hardfok. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem described in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and fixed in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
6e7655b to
dc4d5a2
Compare
AnnaShaleva
added a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change is moved under D hardfork to avoid state diff issues on nodes update. Although it should be noted that it's hard to meet the trigger criteria. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem described in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and fixed in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Member
Author
|
Just for the record (it's not important anymore since we have it under D hardfork): mainnet is not affected by this bug up to 5484582: |
NGDAdmin
pushed a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change is moved under D hardfork to avoid state diff issues on nodes update. Although it should be noted that it's hard to meet the trigger criteria. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem described in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and fixed in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru> Co-authored-by: Shargon <shargon@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy <jinghui@wayne.edu> Co-authored-by: Vitor Nazário Coelho <vncoelho@gmail.com>
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change likely does not affect the mainnet's state since it's hard to meet the trigger criteria, but I'd put it under the hardfork anyway. Ref. neo-project/neo#3290. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
dc4d5a2 to
a7aceca
Compare
roman-khimov
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
NGDAdmin
added a commit
to neo-project/neo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
* [Neo Core Bug]fix 3300 (#3301) * fix 3300 * update format * add state subitems to ref counter, with suggestion from DuSmart * apply hardfork * format * my mistake * fix hardfork * remove negative check * add unit test * apply anna's suggestion --------- Co-authored-by: Shargon <shargon@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: NGD Admin <154295625+NGDAdmin@users.noreply.github.com> * SmartContract: use executing contract state to check permissions (#3290) It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change is moved under D hardfork to avoid state diff issues on nodes update. Although it should be noted that it's hard to meet the trigger criteria. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem described in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and fixed in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru> Co-authored-by: Shargon <shargon@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy <jinghui@wayne.edu> Co-authored-by: Vitor Nazário Coelho <vncoelho@gmail.com> * v3.7.5 * Neo.CLI: enable hardforks for NeoFS mainnet (#3240) Otherwise this configuration file is broken. Port changes from nspcc-dev/neo-go#3446. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru> * fix workflow & FS config * remove hardfork for fs testnet --------- Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru> Co-authored-by: Jimmy <jinghui@wayne.edu> Co-authored-by: Shargon <shargon@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: NGD Admin <154295625+NGDAdmin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru> Co-authored-by: Vitor Nazário Coelho <vncoelho@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check.
This change likely does not affect the mainnet's state since it's hard to meet the trigger criteria, but I'd put it under the hardfork anyway.
Draft: