Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #2705 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 85.28%
=======================================
Files ? 84
Lines ? 7592
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 6475
Misses ? 1117
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
81dedda to
dc1dac3
Compare
|
fixed the tests imho ready for merge. |
|
Maybe we should first release a undici 6.6.2 before we merge this? |
|
I'm still not sure about the right semver change but yes, let's merge this first. |
|
I took the version from HEAD of the default branch of llhttp. Can you make a release of llhttp? THan we just fix the version in this PR. |
|
Sure, I'll release llhttp after lunch. |
|
@Uzlopak llhttp 9.2.0. has just been released. You can quickly rework this PR and then we're ready to go. |
|
Thanks. I just patched the version in the header file. |
mcollina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
I think we should add support/expose the leniency flags, and potentially read those values from node.js core itself. That can be done in a follow-up PR.
|
@mcollina Target changed to next branch |
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
* upgrade llhttp * fix tests * set version of llhttp 9.2.0
To check if this closes #2678 you can run
@mcollinaCan your run some benchmarks on this please?
@ShogunPanda