fix: perf improvement for rfc4648 base decoding#323
Merged
rvagg merged 1 commit intomultiformats:masterfrom May 20, 2025
Merged
fix: perf improvement for rfc4648 base decoding#323rvagg merged 1 commit intomultiformats:masterfrom
rvagg merged 1 commit intomultiformats:masterfrom
Conversation
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2025
## [13.3.5](v13.3.4...v13.3.5) (2025-05-20) ### Bug Fixes * **perf:** improve rfc4648 base decoding ([#323](#323)) ([900b5f6](900b5f6))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 13.3.5 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Making a performance improvement here to rfc4648 base decoding (e.g. base64, base32, base16). On each decoding call we were building-up a dictionary mapping alphabet characters to their index—now this dictionary is built ahead of time.
Benching
CID.parse()against 100,000 base32 CIDs sees an improvement of about 33-35% with this change (node v22.15.1 / macOS / ARM).