Skip to content

python move_group interface: allow setting of targets from any iterable#184

Merged
v4hn merged 2 commits intomoveit:kinetic-develfrom
rhaschke:python-iterable-as-target
Sep 2, 2016
Merged

python move_group interface: allow setting of targets from any iterable#184
v4hn merged 2 commits intomoveit:kinetic-develfrom
rhaschke:python-iterable-as-target

Conversation

@rhaschke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The python MoveGroup interface only allowed to set joint targets from lists, dicts, and some special data structures. This PR

@davetcoleman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Travis says the branch is missing?

I skimmed the changes and it looks alright, but I'm not a python person

@rhaschke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Travis says the branch is missing?

I accidentally pushed my branch to ros-planning first instead of by own fork, which caused Travis to start building. The PR build succeeded.

@v4hn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

v4hn commented Aug 31, 2016

The changes look nice and good to me, but I can't run the test cases over here.
@rhaschke Could you rebase this request against upstream to retrigger CI please?
If they pass, please also file these requests against jade and indigo.
Once CI passed for all of them, I'll merge the requests.

@rhaschke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rhaschke commented Sep 2, 2016

Rebase succeeded, PRs opened for indigo (#199) and jade (#198)

@v4hn v4hn merged commit 23d09fe into moveit:kinetic-devel Sep 2, 2016
v4hn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2016
* moveit_commander: allow setting of targets from any iterable

* disable cleanup test

fails due to ros/ros_comm#871
v4hn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2016
* moveit_commander: allow setting of targets from any iterable

* disable cleanup test

fails due to ros/ros_comm#871
@rhaschke rhaschke deleted the python-iterable-as-target branch September 5, 2016 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants