Skip to content

Conversation

@runcom
Copy link
Member

@runcom runcom commented Apr 11, 2015

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca me@runcom.ninja

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <me@runcom.ninja>
@LK4D4
Copy link
Contributor

LK4D4 commented Apr 12, 2015

We need some day decide what we want. Because in some PRs we getting container in api function and in some in daemon method.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Apr 12, 2015

@LK4D4 I thought about that, I'd like more to have the daemon do the service layer btw, I'll happily refactor when you decide..

@cpuguy83
Copy link
Member

Also very much in favor of having methods on daemon, at least for now.
Let the API talk to one thing (daemon).

LGTM.

@duglin
Copy link
Contributor

duglin commented Apr 12, 2015

LGTM

duglin added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2015
@duglin duglin merged commit 395df2b into moby:master Apr 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants