Skip to content

Conversation

@crosbymichael
Copy link
Contributor

This makes registry.Service a first class type and does not use jobs
to interact with this type.

Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby crosbymichael@gmail.com

This makes `registry.Service` a first class type and does not use jobs
to interact with this type.

Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
@jessfraz
Copy link
Contributor

💃

@jessfraz
Copy link
Contributor

jessfraz commented Apr 1, 2015

omg its so pretty LGTM

@dmp42
Copy link
Contributor

dmp42 commented Apr 1, 2015

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit artifact?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no

@icecrime
Copy link
Contributor

icecrime commented Apr 1, 2015

That's so much simpler <3 One nit, otherwise LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@crosbymichael Also NewDaemonFromDirectory is not used, you can rename it to NewDaemon.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it worth the CI time?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fair enough :)

@tiborvass
Copy link
Contributor

@crosbymichael thanks, much simpler with registry.Service in Daemon. I'll do that for the other things!

@tiborvass
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

tiborvass added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2015
@tiborvass tiborvass merged commit 4467b6a into moby:master Apr 1, 2015
@crosbymichael crosbymichael deleted the registry-jobs branch April 1, 2015 21:34
@icecrime icecrime mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2015
41 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants