Add documentation for KnowledgeRetention scorer#19478
Merged
alkispoly-db merged 1 commit intomlflow:masterfrom Dec 18, 2025
Merged
Add documentation for KnowledgeRetention scorer#19478alkispoly-db merged 1 commit intomlflow:masterfrom
alkispoly-db merged 1 commit intomlflow:masterfrom
Conversation
Update conversational scorer documentation to include the new KnowledgeRetention scorer introduced in PR mlflow#19436. Changes: - Add KnowledgeRetention to Multi-Turn Scorers table in predefined.mdx - Add KnowledgeRetention to Built-in Scorers list in multi-turn.mdx - Position alphabetically between ConversationalToolCallEfficiency and UserFrustration 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Alkis Polyzotis <alkis.polyzotis@databricks.com>
Contributor
|
Documentation preview for 875b084 is available at: Changed Pages (2)
More info
|
smoorjani
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2025
7 tasks
WeichenXu123
pushed a commit
to WeichenXu123/mlflow
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2025
Signed-off-by: Alkis Polyzotis <alkis.polyzotis@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WeichenXu123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2025
Signed-off-by: Alkis Polyzotis <alkis.polyzotis@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🛠 DevTools 🛠
Install mlflow from this PR
For Databricks, use the following command:
Related Issues/PRs
Related to #19436
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds documentation for the new
KnowledgeRetentionscorer that evaluates whether AI assistants correctly retain, contradict, or distort information provided by users in earlier conversation turns.Changes include:
predefined.mdxmulti-turn.mdxHow is this PR tested?
Documentation changes were manually reviewed to ensure:
Does this PR require documentation update?
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
Added documentation for the new KnowledgeRetention scorer in the conversational evaluation guides and predefined scorers reference.
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingarea/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/evaluation: MLflow model evaluation features, evaluation metrics, and evaluation workflowsarea/gateway: MLflow AI Gateway client APIs, server, and third-party integrationsarea/prompts: MLflow prompt engineering features, prompt templates, and prompt managementarea/tracing: MLflow Tracing features, tracing APIs, and LLM tracing functionalityarea/projects: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs: MLflow documentation pagesHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/none- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/breaking-change- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/feature- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notesShould this PR be included in the next patch release?