Support Ruby 3.4's new error message format#987
Closed
mame wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Ruby 3.4 will use a single quote instead of a backtrick as an open quote. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16495 Also, the backtrace line will have not only a method name but also its receiver class. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19117
6fe2e67 to
00affdb
Compare
hsbt
added a commit
to hsbt/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
hsbt
added a commit
to ruby/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
Collaborator
|
THIS IS AMAZING! I hate that backtick! Thank you! Merged. I'll get this released in short order. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ruby 3.4 will use a single quote instead of a backtrick as an open quote.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16495
Also, the backtrace line will have not only a method name but also its receiver class.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19117